Income Tax

ITRs filed prior to 01.04.2019 as per decisions of various High Courts valid – CBDT

ITRs filed prior to 01.04.2019 as per decisions of various High Courts valid. Aadhaar-PAN linking mandatory from 01.04.2019 as per SC judgement – CBDT

Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Direct Taxes
*****

North Block, New Delhi, the 31st of March, 2019

Subject: Giving effect to the judgement(s)/order(s) of Hon’ble Supreme Court on Aadhaar-PAN for filing return of income-regd.-

As per clause (ii) of sub-section (1) of section 139AA of the Income-tax Act, 1961, with effect from 01.07.2017, every person who is eligible to obtain Aadhaar number has to quote the Aadhaar number in return of income.

2. In a series of judgments i.e. (i) Binoy Viswam Vs. Union of India reported in (2017) 396 ITR 66 (ii) Final Judgment and order of the Constitution Bench of Hon’ble Supreme Court dated 26.09.18 in Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and another (Writ Petition (Civil) No. 494 of 2012}; & (iii) Shreya Sen & Anr. In SLP (Civil) Diary No(s) 34292/2018 dated 04.02 .2019, Hon’ble Supreme Court has upheld validity of Section 139AA.

3. In light of the aforesaid judgement(s)/order(s) of Hon’ble Supreme Court, from 04.2019 onwards, to give effect to the above judgements/orders, it has been decided by the Board that provision of clause (ii) of sub-section (1) of section 139AA of the Act would be implemented and it is mandatory to quote abcaus.in Aadhaar while filing the return of income unless specifically exempted as per any notification issued under sub-section (3) of section 139AA of the Act. Thus, returns being filed either electronically or manually cannot be filed without quoting the Aadhaar number.

4. Returns which were filed prior to 01.04.2019 without quoting of Aadhaar number as an outcome of any decision of different High Courts in a specific case or returns which were filed during the period when the online functionality for filing the return without quoting of Aadhaar number was so available in the aftermath of decision of Delhi High Court dated 24.07.18 in W.P. C.M 7444/2018 & C.M. Application No. 28499/2018 in case of Shreya Sen vs. Union of India & Ors., till it was withdrawn post decision of Constitution Bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court dated 26.09.18, would also be taken up for processing without causing any adverse consequence for non-quoting of Aadhaar as per provision of section 139AA of the Act.

5. Hindi version to follow

(Rajarajeswari. R.)
Under Secretary (ITA.II), CBDT

(F. No. 225/75/2019-ITA.II)

Copy to:-

  1. PS to FM/OSD to FM/PS to MoS(F)/OSD to MoS(F)
  2. PS/OSD to Secretary (Revenue)
  1. Chairman, CBDT & All Members, CBDT
  2. All CCsiT/ Pr.DsGIT
  3. All Joint Secretaries/CsiT, CBDT
  4. CIT (M&TP), Official Spokesperson of CBDT
  5. ADG(S)-4 for uploading on official website of income tax department
  6. CIT (Database Cell) for uploading on irsofficersonline.

Download Circular Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

2 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

6 days ago