Income Tax

Modifications to Instruction No. 7/2016-Engagement of Standing Counsels to represent Income-tax before High Courts/other judicial forums

Modifications to Instruction No. 7/2016-Engagement of Standing Counsels to represent Income-tax Department before High Courts/other judicial forums

F. No. 279/Misc/ M-75/ 2011-ITJ (PartII)
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board  of Direct Taxes (A&J Division)

New Delhi, the 18th October, 2016

To
All Principal Chief Commissioners of Income Tax.

Madam/Sir,

Sub:- Modifications to the Instruction No. 7/2016 for  engagement of Standing Counsels to represent the Income-tax Department before High Courts and other judicial forums- Reg.

Ref:-  CBDT Instruction no. 7/2016 dated 7th September 2016.

Kindly refer to the above.

2. Instruction No . 7/2016 of CBDT (hereinafter “Instruction”) has revised the guidelines for engagement of standing counsels to represent the Income Tax Department before High Courts and other judicial forums in supersession of the earlier Instruction 3/2012 of the CBDT on the subject. In this regard, representations have been received from various authorities suggesting modifications and seeking certain clarifications with respect to the matters dealt with in the Instruction.

3. In this regard, after considering the suggestions, the following modifications are hereby made to the instruction

(a) In ‘Duties of the Standing Counsels’ in para 7.2 of Annexure I, the phrase, “Diary number, ITA number shall be substituted with the phrase, “Diary number and ITA number of appeals filed, Diary number of other petitions/ applications filed etc.”

(b) In Annexure II, the para 2 heading, para 1 and para 2.2, the words, “For Drafting” shall be substituted with the words , ”For Drafting and Filing”

(c) In Annexure II, para 12.1.1, the words, “Bills for drafting” shall be substituted with the words, “Bills for drafting and filing.” Also , in the same para 12.1.1, the following sentence shall be added, “Bill for drafting and filing of appeals shall be submitted only after removal of all defects with ITA No. of appeal filed.”

(d) In proforma – ‘X’ of Annexure II, under the head, PRE-RECEIPTED at S. No. 5, the words, “ITA no./WTO no. etc.” shall be substituted with the words, “ITA no. /WTO no.”

(e) In the heading at Part A of proforma- ‘X’ of Annexure II, the words,  “Bill for  drafting” shall be substituted with the words, “Bill for drafting and filing.”

(f) In the second column of the Pro forma- ‘B-1’ and Pro forma- ‘B-2’ of Annexure I of the Instruction at the marking for Academic record (marks scored in LLB), instead of the earlier marking scheme, the revised marking scheme for Academic record (marks scored in LLB) may be read as follows,

“>60%-  5 marks”

(g) In  Annexure  II  of  the  Instruction,  the  following  paragraph,  i.e., para  13, shall be added after para  12.

“13. Dispute Resolution
In the event of any doubt or difference regarding the fees payable to the counsels, the fees determined by the Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax of the Region concerned shall be final and binding.”

4. These modifications may be brought to the notice of all the officers.

5. Hindi version of this will follow.

(K. Vamsi Krishna)
ACIT (OSD)  (ITJ-II)
Tel:  26882637

Share

Recent Posts

  • Empanelment

J&K Bank Ltd. invites on-line applications for empanelment as Stock Auditors

The Jammu & Kashmir Bank Ltd. invites on-line applications for empanelment as Stock Auditors for 3 Financial Years i.e. from…

3 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Broken period interest on securities held as stock-in-trade is revenue expenditure

Broken period interest paid on purchase of securities was revenue expenditure since the securities constituted stock-in-trade In a recent judgment,…

4 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Reassessment on basis of borrowed belief of Anti-Corruption Bureau quashed

ITAT quashed reassessment on the basis of borrowed belief of Anti-Corruption Bureau without applying mind In a recent judgment, ITAT…

18 hours ago
  • Income Tax

In considering disallowance u/s 40A(2) genuineness of expenditure not relevant issue

In considering disallowance u/s 40A(2) for payments to specified persons, genuineness of expenditure is not a relevant issue. In a…

20 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Expression “Yes I am satisfied” in approval u/s 151 not a vital defect – ITAT

Expression “Yes I am satisfied” in approval u/s 151 not such a vital defect on the basis of which, re-opening…

21 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Section 143(1) Intimation not an order for Revision u/s 264 of Income Tax Act

Section 143(1) Intimation is only an intimation and it cannot be treated as an order for the purpose of Section…

24 hours ago