Modifications to Instruction No. 7/2016-Engagement of Standing Counsels to represent Income-tax Department before High Courts/other judicial forums
F. No. 279/Misc/ M-75/ 2011-ITJ (PartII)
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Direct Taxes (A&J Division)
New Delhi, the 18th October, 2016
To
All Principal Chief Commissioners of Income Tax.
Madam/Sir,
Sub:- Modifications to the Instruction No. 7/2016 for engagement of Standing Counsels to represent the Income-tax Department before High Courts and other judicial forums- Reg.
Ref:- CBDT Instruction no. 7/2016 dated 7th September 2016.
Kindly refer to the above.
2. Instruction No . 7/2016 of CBDT (hereinafter “Instruction”) has revised the guidelines for engagement of standing counsels to represent the Income Tax Department before High Courts and other judicial forums in supersession of the earlier Instruction 3/2012 of the CBDT on the subject. In this regard, representations have been received from various authorities suggesting modifications and seeking certain clarifications with respect to the matters dealt with in the Instruction.
3. In this regard, after considering the suggestions, the following modifications are hereby made to the instruction
(a) In ‘Duties of the Standing Counsels’ in para 7.2 of Annexure I, the phrase, “Diary number, ITA number ” shall be substituted with the phrase, “Diary number and ITA number of appeals filed, Diary number of other petitions/ applications filed etc.”
(b) In Annexure II, the para 2 heading, para 1 and para 2.2, the words, “For Drafting” shall be substituted with the words , ”For Drafting and Filing”
(c) In Annexure II, para 12.1.1, the words, “Bills for drafting” shall be substituted with the words, “Bills for drafting and filing.” Also , in the same para 12.1.1, the following sentence shall be added, “Bill for drafting and filing of appeals shall be submitted only after removal of all defects with ITA No. of appeal filed.”
(d) In proforma – ‘X’ of Annexure II, under the head, PRE-RECEIPTED at S. No. 5, the words, “ITA no./WTO no. etc.” shall be substituted with the words, “ITA no. /WTO no.”
(e) In the heading at Part A of proforma- ‘X’ of Annexure II, the words, “Bill for drafting” shall be substituted with the words, “Bill for drafting and filing.”
(f) In the second column of the Pro forma- ‘B-1’ and Pro forma- ‘B-2’ of Annexure I of the Instruction at the marking for Academic record (marks scored in LLB), instead of the earlier marking scheme, the revised marking scheme for Academic record (marks scored in LLB) may be read as follows,
“>60%- 5 marks”
(g) In Annexure II of the Instruction, the following paragraph, i.e., para 13, shall be added after para 12.
“13. Dispute Resolution
In the event of any doubt or difference regarding the fees payable to the counsels, the fees determined by the Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax of the Region concerned shall be final and binding.”
4. These modifications may be brought to the notice of all the officers.
5. Hindi version of this will follow.
(K. Vamsi Krishna)
ACIT (OSD) (ITJ-II)
Tel: 26882637
When information contained in loose papers not corroborated with assessee, there is absolutely no room for presumption that it belongs…
When CIT(A) order to remand case to AO was set aside without interfering with direction to delete addition, order of…
Whether a prohibited claim in a contract applies only to the employer and not to the Arbitral Tribunal – Matter…
Where a contractual employee is terminated on the sole ground of ineligibility, the Court is entitled to examine its correctness…
Upon deceased acquiring family, GPF nomination in favour of mother became invalid and in absence of fresh nomination, mother and…
GSTN Advisory on Auto Suspension of GST Registration due to Non-Furnishing of Bank Account Details as per Rule 10A As…