Income Tax

Modifications to Instruction No. 7/2016-Engagement of Standing Counsels to represent Income-tax before High Courts/other judicial forums

Modifications to Instruction No. 7/2016-Engagement of Standing Counsels to represent Income-tax Department before High Courts/other judicial forums

F. No. 279/Misc/ M-75/ 2011-ITJ (PartII)
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board  of Direct Taxes (A&J Division)

New Delhi, the 18th October, 2016

To
All Principal Chief Commissioners of Income Tax.

Madam/Sir,

Sub:- Modifications to the Instruction No. 7/2016 for  engagement of Standing Counsels to represent the Income-tax Department before High Courts and other judicial forums- Reg.

Ref:-  CBDT Instruction no. 7/2016 dated 7th September 2016.

Kindly refer to the above.

2. Instruction No . 7/2016 of CBDT (hereinafter “Instruction”) has revised the guidelines for engagement of standing counsels to represent the Income Tax Department before High Courts and other judicial forums in supersession of the earlier Instruction 3/2012 of the CBDT on the subject. In this regard, representations have been received from various authorities suggesting modifications and seeking certain clarifications with respect to the matters dealt with in the Instruction.

3. In this regard, after considering the suggestions, the following modifications are hereby made to the instruction

(a) In ‘Duties of the Standing Counsels’ in para 7.2 of Annexure I, the phrase, “Diary number, ITA number shall be substituted with the phrase, “Diary number and ITA number of appeals filed, Diary number of other petitions/ applications filed etc.”

(b) In Annexure II, the para 2 heading, para 1 and para 2.2, the words, “For Drafting” shall be substituted with the words , ”For Drafting and Filing”

(c) In Annexure II, para 12.1.1, the words, “Bills for drafting” shall be substituted with the words, “Bills for drafting and filing.” Also , in the same para 12.1.1, the following sentence shall be added, “Bill for drafting and filing of appeals shall be submitted only after removal of all defects with ITA No. of appeal filed.”

(d) In proforma – ‘X’ of Annexure II, under the head, PRE-RECEIPTED at S. No. 5, the words, “ITA no./WTO no. etc.” shall be substituted with the words, “ITA no. /WTO no.”

(e) In the heading at Part A of proforma- ‘X’ of Annexure II, the words,  “Bill for  drafting” shall be substituted with the words, “Bill for drafting and filing.”

(f) In the second column of the Pro forma- ‘B-1’ and Pro forma- ‘B-2’ of Annexure I of the Instruction at the marking for Academic record (marks scored in LLB), instead of the earlier marking scheme, the revised marking scheme for Academic record (marks scored in LLB) may be read as follows,

“>60%-  5 marks”

(g) In  Annexure  II  of  the  Instruction,  the  following  paragraph,  i.e., para  13, shall be added after para  12.

“13. Dispute Resolution
In the event of any doubt or difference regarding the fees payable to the counsels, the fees determined by the Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax of the Region concerned shall be final and binding.”

4. These modifications may be brought to the notice of all the officers.

5. Hindi version of this will follow.

(K. Vamsi Krishna)
ACIT (OSD)  (ITJ-II)
Tel:  26882637

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Jewellery purportedly received from grandparent under Will added as unexplained credits

Addition u/s 68 for jewellery purportedly received on death of grandparent under Will upheld. In a recent judgment, ITAT upheld…

1 day ago
  • bankruptcy

SC lays down tests to determine if a debt is financial debt or operational under IBC

Supreme Court lays down tests to determine whether a debt is a financial debt or an operational debt under IBC…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Commonality of directors of companies does not mean deposits received was bogus

Merely because directors of two companies were common not mean that deposits received was bogus and companies were shell companies…

2 days ago
  • ITAT

Application though named as rectification but if tax is not legitimate, it also touches merit: HC

Application though named as rectification but if tax imposed is not legitimate then it also touches upon the merit –…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cost of acquisition as on 01.04.1981 taken as per valuer report by reverse indexing of FMV

Cost of acquisition as on 01.04.1981 taken as per valuer report by reverse indexing of current FMV to be further…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

AO was directed to serve notice of hearing through physical mode upon assessee 

ITAT directed AO to serve notice of hearing both through electronic and physical mode upon the assessee  In a recent…

3 days ago