Income Tax

No disallowance u/s 43B for unpaid service tax unless actually received-SC dismisses SLP of ITD

No disallowance u/s 43B for unpaid service tax unless actually received. Supreme Court dismisses the SLP of the Income Tax Department

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2827 (2019) (03) SC

Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties
Commissioner of Income­Tax v. Ovira Logistics P. Ltd [2015] 377 ITR 129 (Bom.)

The Hon’ble Supreme Court has dismissed the Special Leave Petition (SLP) filed by the Income Tax Department against the order of the Hon’ble High Court in upholding the order of the ITAT that the  service tax though debited to the profit and loss account but not credited to the Central Government cannot be disallowed u/s 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act).

Facts of the Case:
In the instant case, the respondent/assessee was a limited company which engaged in the business of providing detection and security services to its clients. 

During the scrutiny proceedings, the Assessing Officer (AO) inter alia, noted that the company had claimed expenses towards unpaid service tax liability.

The Assessing Officer (AO) was of the view that by virtue of Section 43B of the Act, service tax can be allowed only when paid and therefore the amount was not allowable as deduction. Hence, the same was added to the income.

Being aggrieved by this order, the assessee preferred an appeal to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) who held in favour of the assessee.

The matter travelled to the Tribunal which relying upon its finding in the earlier assessment  years, came to the conclusion that though the service tax was included in the bill raised on the customers but it was not actually collected from them. Following its earlier view, the Tribunal agreed with the First Appellate Authority and dismissed the Revenue’s appeal.

The Hon’ble High Court noted that a Division Bench of the High Court had dealt with an identical issue. It was held that Section 43B does not contemplate liability to pay service tax before actual receipt of the funds in the account of the assessee. Hence the liability to pay service tax into the Treasury will arise only upon the assessee receiving the funds and not otherwise. Thus the consideration has to be actually received and thereupon the liability will arise.

Accordingly by the impugned order, the Hon’ble High Court had dismissed the appeal of the Revenue.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Insurance

Calculation of functional disability depends on victim’s earning capacity in open market – SC

Calculation of functional disability depends on assessing the victim’s earning capacity in the open, competitive market – Supreme Court In…

22 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Appeal against ITAT shall lie only before High Court within whose jurisdiction AO is situated

Appeal against every decision of ITAT shall lie only before the High Court within whose jurisdiction the Assessing Officer who…

2 days ago
  • Excise/Custom

SC recommends action against Customs Officer who relied upon AI generated fake case laws

Supreme Court recommends action against Commissioner of Customs who relied upon non-existent AI generated case laws. Supreme Court recommends action…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Non- payment of cost imposed can’t trigger automatic confirmation of an invalid exparte assessment.

ITAT power to pass such orders "as it thinks fit" implies a judicial discretion to be exercised within the parameters…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

7 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

7 days ago