Income Tax

No merit in holding that estimated addition has to be made due to fall in gross profit rate-ITAT

No merit in holding that estimated addition has to be made on account of fall in gross profit rate. ITAT deleted addition

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 3211 (2019) (12) ITAT

In the instant case, appeal was filed by assessee against the order of CIT(A) on the issue of estimated addition made in the hands of the assessee on account of decline in gross profit rate.

The assessee was engaged in the busiess of publication. For the year under consideration, the assessee declared gross profit at the rate of 27.51 per cent as against gross profit rate of 34.49% for immediately preceding year.

The assessee before the Assessing Officer (AO) submitted that decline in gross profit rate could be attributed to sale of old books which had lost their marketability due to fresh editions coming in the market.

The assessee also submitted that decline was on account of fact that fake editions of their best sellers came in the market and to recapture their lost market they had to resort to selling books at heavy discount.

The Assessing Officer however, did not accept the gross profit rate declared by the assessee and made an addition @ 2% of gross sales on account of decline in gross profit rate.

The CIT(A) upheld the order of the Assessing Officer against which the assessee was in appeal before the Tribunal.

The assessee contended that the explanation filed before the authorities below had been rejected in mechanical manner. It was further stated that decline in gross profit rate  were in line in the trade carried on by the assessee as there was stiff competition in the market and the assessee had to offer discounts; hence the gross profit rate declared by the assessee could not be disturbed.

The Tribunal observed that the assessee had filed the reasons for decline in gross profit rate as above before the authorities below. Also, the turnover of the assessee had also increased when compared to the turnover of preceding year.

No merit in holding that estimated addition has to be made on account of fall in gross profit rate

The Tribunal opined that there was no merit in the orders of the authorities below in holding that the estimated addition has to be made on account of fall in gross profit rate.

The Tribunal further noted that the books of accounts maintained by the assessee had not been rejected by the Assessing Officer and only the gross profit rate had been estimated @ 2% over and above, the gross profit rate declared by the assessee.

The Tribunal held that there was no merit in the orders of the authorities below in the given set of facts of the case and accordingly, deleted the addition made in the hands of the assessee.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

2 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

6 days ago