There is no prohibition to adjust seized cash with self assessment tax. Only prohibited is for adjustment of seized cash with advance tax – ITAT
ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 3720 (2023) (04) ITAT
Important Case Laws relied upon:
ACIT vs. Narendra N. Thacker 82 taxmman.com 64
Spaze Towers (P) Ltd Vs. DCIT 76 taxmann.com 371
In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming the action of the Assessing Officer (AO) denying credit for cash seized against tax liability by applying provisions of section 132B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act).
A search and seizure action u/s 132 of the Act was carried out and cash was recovered from the car owned by the appellant assessee.
In the statement recorded u/s 132(4) of the Act, the assessee accepted that the cash found and seized in the car belonged to him and the same was not recorded in his books of accounts. The assessee, in his statement accepted unaccounted income inclusive of cash seized.
Later, the assessee filed return of income for the relevant assessment year had offered the income from other sources as admitted in the statement recorded u/s 132(4) of the Act.
Against his tax liability after adjustment of TDS, advance tax and self assessment tax, the assessee requested for adjustment of the seized cash towards remaining self assessment tax payable by the assessee. This claim was made by the assessee in the return of income itself.
However, the AO did not give credit for tax in the form of seized cash and raised a demand including interest u/s 234B.
The assessee filed a rectification application u/s 154 of the Act wherein, the assessee made a request to treat the seized cash as advance tax payable and accordingly requested for recalculating the interest u/s 234B of the Act.
However, the rectification application was disposed off by the AO against assessee by applying the provisions of Explanation-2 to section 132B of the Act which states that the “existing liability” does not include advance tax payable.
The CIT(A) upheld the action of AO stating that the existing liability does not include advance tax payable.
The Tribunal observed that the assessee, in the rectification application u/s 154 erroneously requested to treat the seized cash as advance tax payable. In fact the rectification application arose from the order u/s 143(3) of the Act passed by the AO wherein, he had failed to give credit for treatment of seized cash as self assessment tax.
The Tribunal expressed displeasure that undisputedly the assessee in the ITR made a claim for adjustment of seized cash with his self assessment tax payable and this was conveniently ignored by the lower authorities.
The Tribunal stated that a bare reading of provisions of section 132B of the Act together with Explanation-2 thereon shows that there is no prohibition to adjust the seized cash with self assessment tax. What is prohibited is only adjustment of seized cash with the advance tax.
The Tribunal also noted the decision of the coordinate bench and the decision of the Hon’ble High Court on this issue which was in favour of the assessee.
Accordingly, the ITAT held that the assessee was entitled for adjustment of seized cash with self assessment tax payable by the assessee in the return of income.
Mere CBDT Instructions cannot absolve individuals of their obligation to explain the source and nature of their gold holdings, even…
Empanelment of General Observers for ICSI Examinations December 2026 ICSI has invited interested members to enroll as General Observers for…
ITAT answers some important and inter-related issues relating to deduction u/s 80IA In a recent judgment, ITAT has dealt with…
Carry forward of loss can not be denied for belated return, it is only the set off in subsequent year…
Where sales are duly recorded in books and VAT returns, to treat it bogus sales, AO must bringing cogent adverse…
Expenses to celebrate Diwali with staff creates a goodwill and, therefore amounts to expenses incurred for the purpose of business…