Income Tax

No re-opening of earlier years cases due to digital payments leading to increased turnover in a particular year. CBDT Circular 40/2016

No re-opening of earlier years cases due to digital payments leading to increased turnover in a particular year.

Circular No. 40/2016

Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue (CBDT)

North Block, New Delhi, the 9th of December, 2016

Subject: – Directions under section 119 of the Income-tax Act, 1961-regd.-

Recent initiatives of the Government to curb the black economy in the country has encouraged people to shift towards digital mode of payment while making financial transactions. By adopting digital mode of payment, no financial transactions would remain undisclosed and consequently an enhanced turnover of business might get reflected in the books of accounts. Under the circumstances, an apprehension has been raised that increased turnover in the current year may lead to reopening of earlier years’ cases involving lower turnover u/s 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’) by the Assessing Officer causing undue harassment to tax payers.

2. It is hereby clarified that reopening of cases u/s 147 of the Act is feasible only when the Assessing Officer “has reason to believe that any income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment for any assessment year” and not merely on the basis of any reason to suspect . Mere increase in turnover, because of use of digital means of payment or otherwise , in a particular year cannot be a sole reason to believe that income has escaped assessment in earlier years. Hence, Assessing Officers are advised not to reopen past assessments in cases merely on the ground that the current year’s turnover has increased.

3. The above may be brought to the notice of all for necessary and strict compliance.

4. Hindi Version to follow.

(Rohit Garg)
Director ITA.II, CBDT

F. No. 225/326/2016/ITA.II

Download Circular 40/2016 Click Here >>

 

 

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

ITAT has power to stay order appealed, even in absence of any subsisting tax demand

ITAT has jurisdiction to stay an order appealed against, even in absence of any subsisting tax demand. In a recent…

1 hour ago
  • Income Tax

Effect of reduced timeline for filing TDS Correction statements on TDS Credits

Effect on a common taxpayer of reduced timeline for filing TDS Correction statements on TDS Credits Income Tax Department has…

23 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Accounting principles and provisions of law do not permit addition of opening balance – ITAT

Accounting principles and provisions of law do not permit the addition in relation to an opening balance - ITAT In…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Penalty for late supply of goods allowable deduction u/s 37 being not a crime or prohibited activity

Penalty levied for late supply of goods is an allowable deduction u/s 37 as late supply neither a crime nor…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Interest received from Cooperative banks allowable deduction u/s 80P to a Cooperative Society

Deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) towards interest received from cooperative banks is allowable to a cooperative society. In a recent judgment, Hon'ble…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

SC to decide distinction in employees & employer contribution to PF, ESI for allowability u/s 43B

Supreme Court to decide difference between employees & employer contribution to PF, ESI for allowability under Section 43B of the…

3 days ago