No re-opening of earlier years cases due to digital payments leading to increased turnover in a particular year.
Circular No. 40/2016
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue (CBDT)
North Block, New Delhi, the 9th of December, 2016
Subject: – Directions under section 119 of the Income-tax Act, 1961-regd.-
Recent initiatives of the Government to curb the black economy in the country has encouraged people to shift towards digital mode of payment while making financial transactions. By adopting digital mode of payment, no financial transactions would remain undisclosed and consequently an enhanced turnover of business might get reflected in the books of accounts. Under the circumstances, an apprehension has been raised that increased turnover in the current year may lead to reopening of earlier years’ cases involving lower turnover u/s 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’) by the Assessing Officer causing undue harassment to tax payers.
2. It is hereby clarified that reopening of cases u/s 147 of the Act is feasible only when the Assessing Officer “has reason to believe that any income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment for any assessment year” and not merely on the basis of any reason to suspect . Mere increase in turnover, because of use of digital means of payment or otherwise , in a particular year cannot be a sole reason to believe that income has escaped assessment in earlier years. Hence, Assessing Officers are advised not to reopen past assessments in cases merely on the ground that the current year’s turnover has increased.
3. The above may be brought to the notice of all for necessary and strict compliance.
4. Hindi Version to follow.
(Rohit Garg)
Director ITA.II, CBDT
F. No. 225/326/2016/ITA.II
Download Circular 40/2016 Click Here >>
Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST – case remanded for determination In a recent…
CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…
Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act. Courts to award a composite…
CIT Revision notice u/s 263 quashed as the Assessing Officer rightly taken DVO value of property sold as actual sale…
Extension of timeline for implementation of mandatory "Ship To GSTIN" and Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities GSTN Advisory dated…
No protective addition required in the hand of a third party when additions have been confirmed in the hands of…