Non PAN holder can furnish Form 60 electronically under EVC or in paper form as required for entering into specified transactions under Rule 114B. CBDT
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
(CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES)
New Delhi, the 9th June, 2017
G.S.R. 569(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 139A and section 285BA, read with section 295 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Income-tax Rules, 1962, namely:—
1. (1) These rules may be called the Income –tax (14th Amendment) Rules, 2017.
(2) They shall come into force from the date of their publication in Official Gazette.
2. In the Income-tax Rules, 1962, in rule 114B, in the second proviso, after the words, “giving therein the particulars of such transaction” the words “either in paper form or electronically under the electronic verification code in accordance with the procedures, data structures, and standards specified by the Principal Director General of Income-tax (Systems) or Director General of Income-tax (Systems)” shall be inserted.
[F. No. 370142/13/2017-TPL]
Dr. T. S. MAPWAL, Under Secy.
Note : (1) The principal rules were published vide notification number S.O. 969(E), dated the 26th March, 1962 and last amended by Income-tax (13th Amendment) Rules, 2017 vide notification number G.S.R. 561(E), dated 08.06.2017.
NSDL latest e-TDS TCS RPU version 1.2 for Tax Year 2026-27 NSDL has revised the e-TDS TCS RPU utility for…
Assessee entitled to claim deprecation u/s 11(6) if corresponding capital expenditure was not claimed as application of income - ITAT…
Chartered Accountants issuing certificates in Form 15CB/Form146 are expected to exercise due care, diligence and professional judgment – CBDT CBDT…
Section 292C of the Income Tax Act 1961 indeed carries presumption of correctness of such seized documents contents but only…
PCIT directed to consider condonation of delay u/s 119(2)(b) in filing revised return to availing benefits of section 44ADA In…
Whether condition of pre-deposit prior to reference to Arbitration is arbitrary and violative of the right to sue – Division…