Income Tax

It is not uncommon for a lady who is on her own to have cash for emergencies

It is not uncommon for a lady who is on her own to have cash for emergencies. ITAT upholds the deletion of addition for cash found during search

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2815 (2019) (03) ITAT

The Revenue had filed the instant appeal against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in deleting the addition relating to unaccounted cash found during the search.

During the income tax search, Rs. 1,00,000/- was found in the residence of the assessee. The Assessing Officer recorded in the assessment order that the assessee in answer to a question, had explained that this amount belonged to his mother.

The Assessing Officer, observed that the appellant was unable to furnish any documentary evidence for this claim.

During the course of assessment, the explanation that cash belong to his mother, with reference to returns of income for two assessment years of the mother was not accepted by the Assessing Officer as these returns had been filed, after the search.

Before the CIT(A), the assessee contended that the residence where cash was found belonged to the appellant’s father and his mother had been residing there alone.

It was submitted that the cash was seized from the pooja room and a lady of 80 years definitely can have a cash balance of ₹ 1,00,000/- for purposes of emergency. The appellant could not naturally have any documentary evidence since it belonged to his mother.

He further contended that the capital of the mother who was an assessee even prior to search, in her returns was around ₹ 25,00,000/-. In view of the above, not accepting the latest returns just because they have been filed after the search was not justified

The CIT(A) opined that it is not uncommon for a lady who is on her own to have Rs. 1,00,000/- for emergencies. The amount also was reflected in the return filed.

Accordingly, the CIT(A) directed the addition to be deleted.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the Revenue as the Revenue could not assail the specific finding recorded by the CIT(A)

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • ICAI

ICAI defers the effective date of Standard on Quality Management SQM1 and SQM2

ICAI defers the mandatory effective date of SQM 1 and SQM 2 The Council of ICAI, at its 451st Meeting…

5 minutes ago
  • Income Tax

Addition based on letter of District Magistrate not recovered during search deleted

Addition deleted as it was made on the basis of letter of District Magistrate which not recovered during the search…

11 hours ago
  • Income Tax

CBDT clarification on threshold for TDS on interest by banks under Income Tax Act 2025

Banks not required to deduct TDS under Income Tax Act 2025 on interest income below threshold limit - CBDT clarification …

12 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Allegations of delay in TDS deposit & person responsible must be tested at trial

Allegations of delay in TDS deposit, role of person responsible are disputed factual matters which must be tested at trial…

23 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Generation & allotment of UIN in Form No. 121 declaration for payment without TDS

Procedure, formats and standards for generation and allotment of Unique Identification Number (UIN) in respect of Form No. 121 declaration…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Penalty u/s 270A deleted as AO failed to mention the relevant clause the case fall

Penalty u/s 270A deleted as AO failed to mention under which clause the case of the assessee fall. In a…

2 days ago