Income Tax

It is not uncommon for a lady who is on her own to have cash for emergencies

It is not uncommon for a lady who is on her own to have cash for emergencies. ITAT upholds the deletion of addition for cash found during search

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2815 (2019) (03) ITAT

The Revenue had filed the instant appeal against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in deleting the addition relating to unaccounted cash found during the search.

During the income tax search, Rs. 1,00,000/- was found in the residence of the assessee. The Assessing Officer recorded in the assessment order that the assessee in answer to a question, had explained that this amount belonged to his mother.

The Assessing Officer, observed that the appellant was unable to furnish any documentary evidence for this claim.

During the course of assessment, the explanation that cash belong to his mother, with reference to returns of income for two assessment years of the mother was not accepted by the Assessing Officer as these returns had been filed, after the search.

Before the CIT(A), the assessee contended that the residence where cash was found belonged to the appellant’s father and his mother had been residing there alone.

It was submitted that the cash was seized from the pooja room and a lady of 80 years definitely can have a cash balance of ₹ 1,00,000/- for purposes of emergency. The appellant could not naturally have any documentary evidence since it belonged to his mother.

He further contended that the capital of the mother who was an assessee even prior to search, in her returns was around ₹ 25,00,000/-. In view of the above, not accepting the latest returns just because they have been filed after the search was not justified

The CIT(A) opined that it is not uncommon for a lady who is on her own to have Rs. 1,00,000/- for emergencies. The amount also was reflected in the return filed.

Accordingly, the CIT(A) directed the addition to be deleted.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the Revenue as the Revenue could not assail the specific finding recorded by the CIT(A)

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non- payment of cost imposed can’t trigger automatic confirmation of an invalid exparte assessment.

ITAT power to pass such orders "as it thinks fit" implies a judicial discretion to be exercised within the parameters…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

3 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

7 days ago