Income Tax

Penalty 271J-Furnishing incorrect report-certificate by CA, merchant banker or registered valuer. CIT(A) may direct Rs 10000 penalty

Penalty 271J-Furnishing incorrect report-certificate by Chartered Accountants, merchant banker or registered valuer. CIT(A) may direct Rs. 10000 as penalty for each report/certificate

Budget 2017-18 : Penalty on professionals for furnishing incorrect information in statutory report or certificate.

The thrust of the Government in recent past is on voluntary compliance. Certification of various reports and certificates by a qualified professional has been provided in the Act to ensure that the information furnished by an assessee under the provisions of the Act is correct. Various provisions exist under the Act to penalise the defaulting assessee in case of furnishing incorrect information. However, there exist no penal provision for levy of penalty for furnishing incorrect information by the person who is responsible for certifying the same.

In order to ensure that the person furnishing report or certificate undertakes due diligence before making such certification, it is proposed to insert a new section 271J so as to provide that if an accountant or a merchant banker or a registered valuer, furnishes incorrect information in a report or certificate under any provisions of the Act or the rules made thereunder, the Assessing Officer or the Commissioner (Appeals) may direct him to pay a sum of ten thousand rupees for each such report or certificate by way of penalty.

It is further proposed to define the expressions “accountant”, “merchant banker” and “registered valuer”.

It is also proposed to provide through amendment of section 273B that if the person proves that there was reasonable cause for the failure referred to in the said section, then penalty shall not be imposable in respect of the proposed section 271J.

These amendments will take effect from 1st April, 2017.

Also Read:

Panalty u/s 271J – Those afraid of the sword of the Damocles, should not aspire to be Dionysius Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Registration u/s 12AB granted as activities fall under general public utility, if not education as claimed

ITAT directed registration u/s 12AB as activities of the trust fall under general public utility services if not falling fall…

17 hours ago
  • Income Tax

How a loan amount was utilised wouldn’t constitute failure to discharge onus u/s 68

Utilisation of loan amount would not constitute failure to discharge onus caste u/s 68 in absence of any defect in…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

No addition based on third party information in form of unsigned excel sheet – ITAT

Addition on the basis of third party information in form of unsigned excel sheet can not be sustained - ITAT…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Shagun money received on occasion of marriage not taxable income – ITAT

Shagun money received on marriage of individual cannot be considered as income in the year of its receipt - ITAT…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

There is no statutory requirement to maintain cash book for salaried individual – ITAT

ITAT deleted addition towards cash deposited in bank account observing that there is no statutory requirement to maintain cash book…

6 days ago
  • RBI

Foreign Exchange Management (Authorised Persons) Regulations, 2026 notified

RBI has notified the Foreign Exchange Management (Authorised Persons) Regulations, 2026. The Regulation becomes effective from 06.05.2026  A person seeking…

7 days ago