Income Tax

Penalty 271J-Furnishing incorrect report-certificate by CA, merchant banker or registered valuer. CIT(A) may direct Rs 10000 penalty

Penalty 271J-Furnishing incorrect report-certificate by Chartered Accountants, merchant banker or registered valuer. CIT(A) may direct Rs. 10000 as penalty for each report/certificate

Budget 2017-18 : Penalty on professionals for furnishing incorrect information in statutory report or certificate.

The thrust of the Government in recent past is on voluntary compliance. Certification of various reports and certificates by a qualified professional has been provided in the Act to ensure that the information furnished by an assessee under the provisions of the Act is correct. Various provisions exist under the Act to penalise the defaulting assessee in case of furnishing incorrect information. However, there exist no penal provision for levy of penalty for furnishing incorrect information by the person who is responsible for certifying the same.

In order to ensure that the person furnishing report or certificate undertakes due diligence before making such certification, it is proposed to insert a new section 271J so as to provide that if an accountant or a merchant banker or a registered valuer, furnishes incorrect information in a report or certificate under any provisions of the Act or the rules made thereunder, the Assessing Officer or the Commissioner (Appeals) may direct him to pay a sum of ten thousand rupees for each such report or certificate by way of penalty.

It is further proposed to define the expressions “accountant”, “merchant banker” and “registered valuer”.

It is also proposed to provide through amendment of section 273B that if the person proves that there was reasonable cause for the failure referred to in the said section, then penalty shall not be imposable in respect of the proposed section 271J.

These amendments will take effect from 1st April, 2017.

Also Read:

Panalty u/s 271J – Those afraid of the sword of the Damocles, should not aspire to be Dionysius Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Prior period income cannot be considered as income of the current year

When prior period expenses are not admissible as deduction, following the same principle the prior period income also cannot be…

5 hours ago
  • Income Tax

SC condoned delay of 972 days in filing appeal due to restructuring in Department

Supreme Court condoned delay of 972 days in filing appeal due to restructuring in Income Tax Department In a recent…

19 hours ago
  • Income Tax

No addition on mere valuation report when stamp duty valuation is available

Addition can not be made relying on the valuation report of property when the stamp duty valuation is also available…

23 hours ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT deleted penalty for making a wrong claim of deduction u/s 54F/54B

Wrong claim of deduction u/s 54F/54B was not a case of concealment of particulars of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars…

1 day ago
  • GST

Value of taxable supply and rates notified Pan Masala / tobacco products

CBIC notifies GST rates and value of taxable supply for Biris, Pan Masala / tobacco products  Ministry of Finance(Department of…

1 day ago
  • Excise/Custom

CBIC issues SOP for wearing Body Cam by Custom officers in Baggage Clearance

CBIC has issued a Standard Operating Procedure (SoP) for wearing Body Cam by Custom officers responsible for Baggage Clearance According…

2 days ago