Income Tax

Period of holding under Rule 8AA on conversion u/s 115JG(1) to include previous owner

Period of holding under Rule 8AA on conversion u/s 115JG(1) to include previous owner by mode of acquisition u/s 49(1) or section 115JG(1) – Notification

MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
(CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES)

Notification No. 86/2018

New Delhi, the 6th December, 2018

INCOME-TAX

S.O. 6054(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (ii) of the Explanation 1 to clause (42A) of section 2 read with section 295 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Income-tax Rules, 1962, namely:

1. (1) These rules may be called the Income-tax (13th amendment), Rules, 2018.
(2) They shall come into force from the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.

2. In rule 8AA of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, after sub-rule (3), the following shall be inserted, namely,─

“ (4) In the case of a capital asset which became the property of the Indian subsidiary company in consequence to conversion of a branch of a foreign company referred to in subsection (1) of the section 115JG, there shall be included the period for which the asset was held by the said branch of the foreign company and by the previous owner, if any, who has acquired the capital asset by a mode of acquisition referred to in clause (i) or clause (ii) or clause (iii) or clause (iv) of sub-section (1) of section 49 or sub-section (1) of section 115JG.”.

F.No.370133/34/2016-TPL (Part)

PRAVIN RAWAL, Director (Tax Policy & Legislation)

Note : The Principal Rules were published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) vide notification number S.O. 969(E), dated the 26th of March, 1962 and were last amended vide notification number G.S.R. 1128(E) dated the 19th November, 2018.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Government

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App not disproportionate – Delhi High Court

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…

10 hours ago
  • Income Tax

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…

13 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash not owner who came up to own it

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…

2 days ago
  • RTI

Lokayukta Police not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005 – SC

Lokayukta Police not an ‘intelligence and security’ organisation  and hence not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST – case remanded for determination In a recent…

7 days ago
  • ICAI

CA Misconduct – Order quashed as judgment not passed by same members who heard arguments.

CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…

1 week ago