Income Tax

POEM Clarification-Multinational companies with regional headquarter structure and employees with multi-country responsibility

POEM Clarification for multinational companies with regional headquarter structure with employees having multi-country responsibility

Circular No 25 of 2017

F No 142/ 11/2015-TPL (Part-1)
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Direct Taxes
******

New Delhi, 23rd October, 2017

Subject : Clarification  related  to  guidelines  for  establishing    ‘Place  of  Effective Management ‘ (PoEM) in India-reg.

The concept of ‘Place of Effective Management’ (PoEM) for deciding residency status of a company , other than an Indian company,was introduced in the  Income­ tax Act, 1961 (the Act) which has become effective from 1st April, 2017, i.e., Assessment Year 2017- 18 onwards .

2. Guiding Principles for determination of PoEM of a company were issued on 24th January, 2017 vide Circular No 06 of 2017 . Further, vide Circular No 08 of 2017 dated 23rd February, 2017, it has been clarified that the PoEM provisions shall not apply to a company having turnover or gross receipts of Rs 50 crore or less in a financial year.

3. Representations have been received from the stakeholders wherein concerns have been raised that as per the extant guidelines , PoEM may be triggered in cases of certain multinational companies with regional headquarter structure merely on the ground that certain employees having multi-country responsibility or oversight over the operations abcaus.in in other countries of the region are working from India, and consequently, their income from operations outside India may be taxed in India.

4. In this regard, it may be mentioned that Para 7 of the guidelines provides that the place of effective management  in case  of  a  company  engaged  in  active business outside India (ABOI) shall be presumed to be outside India if the  majority meetings of the board of directors (BoD) of the company are held outside India.

4.1 However, Para 1 of the guidelines provides that if on the basis of facts and circumstances it is established that the Board of directors of the company are standing aside and not exercising their powers of management and such powers are being exercised by either the holding company or any other person (s) resident in India, then the PoEM shall be considered to be in India.

4.2 It has also been provided that for this purpose, merely because the BoD follows general and objective principles of global policy of the group laid down by the parent entity which may be in the field of Pay roll functions, Accounting , Human resource (HR) functions , IT infrastructure and network platforms, Supply abcaus.in chain functions, Routine banking operational procedures, and not being specific to any entity or group of entities per se; would not constitute a case of BoD of companies standing aside .

5. In view of the above, it is clarified that so long as the Regional Headquarter operates for subsidiaries/ group companies in a region within the general and objective principles of global policy of the group laid down by the parent entity in the field of Pay roll functions, Accounting, HR functions, IT infrastructure and network platforms, Supply chain functions, Routine banking operational procedures, and not being specific to any entity or group of entities per se; it would, in itself, not constitute a case of  BoD of companies abcaus.in standing aside and such activities of Regional Headquarter in India alone will not be a basis for establishment of PoEM for such subsidiaries/ group companies.

6. It may be mentioned that the provisions of General Anti-Avoidance Rule contained in Chapter X-A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 may get triggered in such cases where the above clarification is found to be used for abusive/ aggressive tax planning.

(Niraj Kumar)
Under Secretary to the Government of India
Tel: 011-23095468
Email: ustpl1@nic.in

Copy to:-

  1. PS to Finance Minister/ OSD to Finance Minister/ OSD to Minister of State for Finance
  2. PS to Secretary (Revenue).
  3. The Chairperson, Members and all other officers in CBDT of the rank of Under Secretary and above.
  4. All Chief  Commissioners/  Pr. Director General of  Income-tax- with a request to circulate amongst all officers in their regions/ charges.
  5. DGIT (Systems)/  Pr. DGIT  (Vigilance)/  Pr. DGIT  (Admn.)/  Pr. DG  (NADT)/  Pr. DGIT (L&R).
  6. CIT (M&TP), CBDT
  7. Web manager for posting on the departmental website
  8. Data Base Cell for uploading on irsofficersonline.gov.in
  9. Guard File
Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

ITAT allows exemption of Rs. 25 lakhs u/s 10(10A) to non-government employees

ITAT allowed increased exemption of Rs. 25 lakhs u/s 10(10A) to non-government employees in view of CBDT retrospective notification. In…

19 hours ago
  • Income Tax

PCIT has revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 over the cases passed by the NFAC or the JAO

PCIT has revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 over the cases irrespective of the fact that the relevant assessment was completed physical…

1 day ago
  • Insurance

Appellate court interfering with MACT finding must undertake reappreciation of evidence

Appellate court interfering with Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal findings on assessment of disability and loss of earning capacity must undertake…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

When delay is not huge & involves huge monetary liability, lenient approach to be taken

When period of delay is not very huge and involve huge monetary liability on the assessee, a lenient approach should…

2 days ago
  • SEBI

EoGM of company can not ratify diversion of fund raised by preferential issue – SC

Ratification by EoGM of the company can not give legality of the diversion of the fund raised by preferential issue.…

3 days ago
  • Excise/Custom

Return of export cargo from Hormuz Strait where vessel do not lands at original port

CBIC prescribes procedures for return of export cargo from international waters due to closure of the Strait of Hormuz where…

3 days ago