Income Tax

Prior period expenses disallowance deleted as tax rate was same from year to year

Disallowance for prior period expenses deleted by the ITAT as the tax rate was the same from one year to another year

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 3004 (2019) (06) ITAT

In this appeal, the revenue WAS aggrieved with the order of the CIT(A) in deleting the addition made by the Assessing Officer (AO) on account of prior period expenses.

The Tribunal noted that the Coordinate Bench in assessee’s own case had deleted the disallowance of deduction on account of prior period expenses.

The Coordinate Bench, considering the volume of transaction of the company and the fact that the taxation rate being the same from one year to another year , had opined that it does not make any difference whether the expenses are allowed in the year or in the earlier years.

The Tribunal had noted that it was not the case of the assessee that expenses were knowingly not charged to the accounts. According to the assessee, there was a time limit for finalzation of the accounts at the Head Office which could not wait for any further for receipt of the information from the branches.

The Revenue when asked could not point out as to as to whether the said order of the Tribunal was even challenged before the Hon’ble High Court or whether the Hon’ble High Court had taken any contrary view.

Under these circumstances, being the same, the Tribunal following the order in assessee’s own case, upheld the order of the CIT(A), who had deleted the addition.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Bank

State Bank of India elects four Directors in its Central Board

State Bank of India in its General Meeting of the Shareholders elected four Directors to the Central Board. The meeting…

4 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Declaration of additional income by increasing the WIP was not proper – ITAT

Voluntary declaration of additional income by increasing WIP was not proper, as assessee will take the additional benefit in the…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Cash payment for purchase of land or property not violation of 269SS or 269T

Cash payment for purchase of land or property cannot be treated as violation of provisions of section 269SS or 269T…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Excel Utility for ITR-1 and ITR-4 available for e-filing for AY 2026-27

Income Tax Department has released excel Utility for e-filing ITR-1 and ITR-4 for AY 2026-27 Excel utilities of ITR-1 and…

3 days ago
  • Insurance

Mediclaim amount not deductible from MACT award under medical expenses – SC

Amount of money received as Mediclaim not deductible from an award passed by MACT under the head of medical expenses.…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT jurisdiction is decided by location of AO passing the impugned order

Location of the assessing officer who passed the order shall decide the jurisdiction of the Bench of the Tribunal In…

4 days ago