Income Tax

Prior period expenses disallowance deleted as tax rate was same from year to year

Disallowance for prior period expenses deleted by the ITAT as the tax rate was the same from one year to another year

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 3004 (2019) (06) ITAT

In this appeal, the revenue WAS aggrieved with the order of the CIT(A) in deleting the addition made by the Assessing Officer (AO) on account of prior period expenses.

The Tribunal noted that the Coordinate Bench in assessee’s own case had deleted the disallowance of deduction on account of prior period expenses.

The Coordinate Bench, considering the volume of transaction of the company and the fact that the taxation rate being the same from one year to another year , had opined that it does not make any difference whether the expenses are allowed in the year or in the earlier years.

The Tribunal had noted that it was not the case of the assessee that expenses were knowingly not charged to the accounts. According to the assessee, there was a time limit for finalzation of the accounts at the Head Office which could not wait for any further for receipt of the information from the branches.

The Revenue when asked could not point out as to as to whether the said order of the Tribunal was even challenged before the Hon’ble High Court or whether the Hon’ble High Court had taken any contrary view.

Under these circumstances, being the same, the Tribunal following the order in assessee’s own case, upheld the order of the CIT(A), who had deleted the addition.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Interest liability recognised by journal entries at the close of year, can’t be termed as fictitious – ITAT

Merely because interest liability was recognised by journal entries at the close of the year, it does not make expenditure…

16 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Cash deposits in bank which were immediately transferred to other accounts – addition deleted

Addition for cash deposits in bank account which were immediately transferred to other accounts deleted in absence any enquiry by…

20 hours ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT disallows 6% for alleged bogus purchases being appropriate

ITAT disallows 6% for alleged bogus purchases as purchases from unregistered dealers could not be ruled out. In a recent…

20 hours ago
  • Income Tax

CBDT can’t restrict power of CIT u/s 119(2)(b) to condone delay beyond six years – High Court

CBDT Circular can’t restrict powers of Income Tax Authority u/s 119(2)(b) to condone delay beyond six years In a recent…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT allows benefit of the cash bought at the time of migration from Pakistan

Benefit of the cash bought at the time of migration from Pakistan allowed as assessee fulfilled conditions of CBDT Circular…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Ambiguous penalty notices cannot be foundation of imposition of any penalty – SC

Ambiguous notices without striking off the irrelevant limb cannot be the foundation of imposition of any penalty – Supreme Court…

4 days ago