Income Tax

Reassessment u/s 148 due to credit card payment. Addition deleted in view of returned income

Reassessment u/s 148 due to credit card payment. ITAT directed AO to delete the addition made in view of returned income of the assessee

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 3197A (2019) (12) ITAT

The instant appeal was filed by the assessee against the order of the CIT(A) in the matter of order passed U/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). The grievance of the assessee inter alia was addition made by the Assessing Officer (AO) in respect of payments made by credit card.  

The assessee was a widow lady having income from property and interest income. For the A.Y. under consideration, the A.O. reopened the assessment on the ground that the assessee had made large payment against credit card. In reply to notice issued u/s 148, the assessee filed her return of income.

The Tribunal observed that The AO had made addition in respect of credit card payment of Rs. 3,65,117/-. It was noted that the assessee had declared following income during the earlier and current years:  

Assessment Year

Gross Total Income

Previous AY

1788209

Previous AY

2144466

Current AY

737772

The Tribunal noted that during the year under consideration, the assessee had shown income of Rs. 7,37,772/- and the total income for the last three years as shown by the assessee was Rs. 46,70,477/-.

The Tribunal opined that the income declared by the assessee was sufficient to take care of credit card payment. Accordingly, the Tribunal direct the A.O. to allow credit card payment.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

In absence of mala fide intention bank should not be treated as assessee in default

In absence of mala fide intention bank should not be treated as assessee in default for late deduction and deposit…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Whether bank account was fraudulently open in the name of assessee is question of fact

Whether bank account was fraudulently open in the name of assessee is question of fact. High Court declined to entertain…

2 days ago
  • Concurrent Audit

SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of Chartered Accountant Firms 2024-25. Last date 18.05.2024

SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of Chartered Accountant Firms for FY 2024-25 SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of CA Firms for FY…

2 days ago
  • Companies Act

Change in the constitution of Appellate Authority for CAs CSs and Cost Accountants

Change in the constitution of Appellate Authority for CAs CSs and Cost Accountants In 2015, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs…

3 days ago
  • VAT

Trade Tax refund withheld beyond stipulated period & adjusted from demand unjustified – SC

Trade Tax Department was unjustified in retaining refund beyond stipulated period and adjusting it against default notices issued subsequently. In…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income assessee is invalid

Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income by the assessee was invalid. Before filing ITR provisions…

4 days ago