Reassessment u/s 148 due to credit card payment. ITAT directed AO to delete the addition made in view of returned income of the assessee
ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 3197A (2019) (12) ITAT
The instant appeal was filed by the assessee against the order of the CIT(A) in the matter of order passed U/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). The grievance of the assessee inter alia was addition made by the Assessing Officer (AO) in respect of payments made by credit card.
The assessee was a widow lady having income from property and interest income. For the A.Y. under consideration, the A.O. reopened the assessment on the ground that the assessee had made large payment against credit card. In reply to notice issued u/s 148, the assessee filed her return of income.
The Tribunal observed that The AO had made addition in respect of credit card payment of Rs. 3,65,117/-. It was noted that the assessee had declared following income during the earlier and current years:
|
Assessment Year |
Gross Total Income |
|
Previous AY |
1788209 |
|
Previous AY |
2144466 |
|
Current AY |
737772 |
The Tribunal noted that during the year under consideration, the assessee had shown income of Rs. 7,37,772/- and the total income for the last three years as shown by the assessee was Rs. 46,70,477/-.
The Tribunal opined that the income declared by the assessee was sufficient to take care of credit card payment. Accordingly, the Tribunal direct the A.O. to allow credit card payment.
Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…
High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…
Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…
Lokayukta Police not an ‘intelligence and security’ organisation and hence not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005…
Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST – case remanded for determination In a recent…
CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…