Income Tax

Rule 10RB-Relief in tax payable u/s 115JB(1) due to operation of Section 115JB(2D)

Income Tax Rule 10RB – Relief in tax payable u/s 115JB(1) due to operation of sub-section (2D) of section 115JB

CBDT vide Notification No. 92/2021 dated 10th August 2021 has notified Income tax (23rd Amendment), Rules, 2021. A new Income tax Rule 10RB has been inserted to provide relief in tax payable under sub-section (1) of section 115JB due to operation of sub-section (2D) of section 115JB.

As per the new Rule 10RB, the tax payable shall be reduced as under:

(A-B) –(D-C), where,

A = tax payable by the assessee company under sub-section (1) of section 115JB on the book profit of the previous year including the past income;

B = tax payable by the assessee company under sub-section (1) of section 115JB on the book profit of the previous year after reducing the book profit with the past income;

C = Aggregate of tax payable by the assessee company under sub-section (1) of section 115JB on the book profit of those past year or years to which the past income belongs; D = Aggregate of tax payable by the assessee company under sub-section (1) of section 115JB on the book profit of past year or years, referred to in item C, after increasing the book profit with the relevant past income of such year or years:

Provided that if the value of (A-B)-(D-C) in the formula is negative, its value shall be deemed to be zero.

For claiming such relief, the assessee company shall have to make a claim for relief under sub-section (2D) of section 115JB in Form No. 3CEEA electronically.

 

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

13 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

3 days ago
  • GST

A bland statement of ‘fraud or concealment of facts” in GST Notice u/s 74 not sufficient – SC

In GST Notice u/s 74, allegations should emanate from itself, a bland statement of ‘fraud or concealment of facts” not…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

For claiming deduction u/s 57(iii), test is of purpose and connection, not actual yield – ITAT

For claiming deduction u/s 57(iii) a reasonable and intelligible nexus should be established between the expenditure incurred and the income…

6 days ago