Income Tax

Senior Very Senior Citizens born on 1st April of the calendar year attain/complete qualifying age of 60/80 years on 31st March. CBDT Circular 28/2016

Circular No. 28/2016

Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Direct Taxes

North Block, New Delhi dated the 27th of July, 2016

Subject: Clarification regarding attaining prescribed Age of 60 years / 80 years on 31st March itself, in case of Senior/Very Senior Citizens  whose  date  of birth falls on 1st April, for purposes of Income-tax Act,1961-regd.-

Higher tax exemption limits have been prescribed under the past Finance Acts for resident senior citizen taxpayers who have attained the age of sixty years. Even in such cases, the exemption limit is still higher for very senior citizens who have attained the age of eighty years. A doubt has been raised about the attainment of the aforesaid qualifying ages for availing higher exemption in cases of the persons whose date of birth falls on 1st April of calendar year. In other words, the broader question under consideration is whether a person born on 1st April of a particular year can be said to have completed a particular age on 31st March, on the preceding day of his/her birthday, or on 1st April itself of that year.

2. The matter has been examined . Although specific provision does not exist in this regard under the Income-tax Act, 1961, the Hon’ble Supreme Court had an occasion to consider a similar issue in the case of Prabhu Dayal Sesma vs. State of Rajasthan & another 1986, AIR , 1948 wherein it has dealt with on the general rules to be followed for calculating the age of the In this judgment , Apex Court observed that while counting the age of the person, whole of the day should be reckoned and it starts from 12 o’clock in the midnight and he attains the specified age on the preceding, the anniversary of his birthday. The observation of Honble Supreme Court in para 9 of the aforesaid judgment reads as under:

“9….. At first impression, it may seem that a person born on January 2, 1956 would attain 28 years of age only on January 2, 1984 and not on January 1, 1984. But this is not quite accurate. In calculating a person’s age, the day of his birth must be counted as a whole day and he attains the specified age on the day preceding, the anniversary of his birthday.  We have to apply well accepted rules for computation of time. One such rule is that fractions of a day will be omitted in computing a period of time is years or months in the sense that a fraction of a day will be treated as a full day. A legal day commences at 12 o’clock midnight and continues until the same hour the following night. There is a popular misconception that a person does (sic not) attain a particular age unless and until he  has  completed  a  given number of years . In the absence of any express provision , it is well settled that any specified age in law is to be computed as having been attained on the day preceding the anniversary of the birthday”

3. In view of the aforesaid judgment, the Central Board of Direct Taxes , in exercise of powers under section 119 of the Act, hereby clarifies that a person bom on 1st April would be considered to have attained  a particular  age  on 31st March, the  day  preceding  the  anniversary  of  his    In  particular ,  the  question  of attainment of age of eligibility for being considered a  senior / very  senior  citizen would therefore be decided on the basis of above criteria.

4. The field authorities are directed to take note of  above  position  for ascertaining the age while computing tax liability of a taxpayer falling in ‘Individual’ category, being resident in India.

Rohit Garg
Deputy Secretary to Government of India

(F. No. 225/182/2016/ITA.II)

Share

Recent Posts

  • GST

Order u/s 69 of the CGST Act has to be communicated before arrest of person concerned– SC

Order u/s 69 of the CGST Act authorising arrest of a person has to be communicated to him before arrest–…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Refund can not be denied on the ground that it was claimed in a return filed u/s 148 – ITAT

Refund can not be denied on the ground that it was claimed in a return filed u/s 148 where no…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Distinction between religious & charitable purposes is determined by institution’s primary or dominant object

The distinction between religious and charitable purposes is determined by institution's primary or dominant object and not merely by presence…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Fit case to issue notice u/s 148 – Relevancy of material & application of mind to objections important

For determination of what constitutes a fit case to issue notice u/s 148, rule of relevancy of the material and…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

AO is under an obligation to assign reasons for rejecting explanation of the assessee

AO is under an obligation to duly consider the explanation furnished by the assessee and assign reasons for rejecting the…

4 days ago
  • Excise/Custom

CBIC issues SoP for clearance of imported goods through Foreign Post Offices

CBIC issues SoP for clearance of imported goods through Foreign Post Offices under Postal Import Regulations, 2025.  Standard Operating Procedure…

4 days ago