Special Courts notified under Income Tax & Black Money Act for State of Jharkhand at Ranchi, Jamshedpur and Dhanbad
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
(CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES)
(Investigation Division-V)
New Delhi, the 15th June, 2023
S.O. 2661(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 280A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961) read with section 84 of the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015 (22 of 2015), the Central Government, in consultation with the Chief Justice of the High Court of Jharkhand, hereby designates the following Courts in the State of Jharkhand, as mentioned in column (2) of the Table below, as Special Courts for the areas mentioned in column (3) of the said Table, for the purposes of sub-section (1) of section 280A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and section 84 of the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015, namely:-
TABLE
| Serial Number | Court | Areas |
| (1) | (2) | (3) |
| 1. | Special Court (Economic Offences), Ranchi | Ranchi, Lohardaga, Gumla, Simdega, Khunti, Palamau, Latehar, and Garhwa |
| 2. | Special Court (Economic Offences), Jamshedpur | East Singhbhum, West Singhbhum, and Seraikella-Kharsawan |
| 3. | Special Court (Economic Offences), Dhanbad | Dhanbad, Bokaro, Giridih, Hazaribagh, Ramgarh, Koderma, Chatra, Dumka, Deoghar, Godda, Pakur, Jamtara, and Sahebganj |
[F. No.285/08/2023-IT (Inv.V)/
DEEPAK TIWARI, Commissioner of Income Tax(OSD) (INV.),
In absence of a valid final assessment order passed within statutory time frame, draft assessment order cannot give rise to…
No disallowance u/s 43B can be made if expenditure has not been not claimed by the assessee in Profit and…
Whether an assessee developing an infrastructure facility of Government is a contractor and ineligible for claim of deduction under Section…
Jurisdictional Principal Commissioner of Income-tax or Commissioner of Income-tax to condone delay in filing Form No. 10A for Registration u/s…
AO was not justified in making addition by adopting method of extrapolation without bringing any material evidence in support -…
Court can not sit over comparative financial attractiveness of rival offers or to substitute its own view for the decision…