Income Tax

TDS not applicable on payment of bank guarantee commission as there is no element of agency

TDS not applicable on payment of bank guarantee commission to bank listed in second schedule to RBI Act as there is no element of agency 

ABCAUS Case Law Citation
ABCAUS 3580 (2022) (02) ITAT

Important case law relied referred:
Kotak Securities Ltd. Vs. DCIT [2012] 18 taxmann.com 48 (Mum.)

TDS not applicable on payment of bank guarantee commission 

In the instant case, the Revenue had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in deleting the disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) made by Assessing Officer (AO) towards non-deduction of tax at source (TDS) on guarantee commission paid to the bank.

Commissioner (Appeals) found that as per CBDT Circular No. 56 of 2012, TDS provisions are not applicable on debit/ credit/ commission/ bank guarantee commission on the transactions made by a person with the bank listed in the second schedule to the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 excluding a foreign bank. 

Further, the CIT(A) relied upon judicial precedents and held that   there was no requirement to deduct tax at source on payment of bank guarantee commission to the Bank.

The Tribunal said there was no error in the decision of first appellate authority. Admittedly, the payment subject matter of disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act was bank guarantee commission paid to a schedule Indian bank.

The Tribunal opined that as rightly held by Commissioner (Appeals) there is no element of agency between the assessee and the bank, insofar as, it relates to payment of guarantee commission.  

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

2 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

6 days ago