Income Tax

Yamuna Expressway Authority-If charitable Institution us 12AA or not to be decided by Allahabad High Court, Questions of Law framed

Yamuna Expressway Authority-If charitable Institution us 12AA or not to be decided by Allahabad High Court, Questions of Law framed

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
1054 (2016) (11) HC

Important Case under consideration:
Sri Ramtanu Co-operative Society v. State of Maharashtra [1970(3) SCC ]
Indian Trade Promotion Organization v. Director General of Income-tax(Exemption) & others [(2015)-371 ITR 333]

Brief Facts of the Case:
The Hon’ble Allahabad High Court has admitted an appeal against the order of the ITAT in allowing the registration of M/S Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority u/s 12AA of as charitable institution. The following questions of Law have been framed by the Hon’ble Court

(i) Whether on the basis of the facts of the case and the law applicable, the Tribunal was justified in allowing the appeal and issuing a direction to the authority concerned to register the respondent as being entitled to exemption under the provisions of Section 12-AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and read with Section 2 (15) thereof?

(ii) Whether the findings recorded by the Tribunal to the effect that the respondent-assessee was not carrying out any activity of profit and it’s predominant object of welfare of public at large are correct or not? 

(iii) Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal at New Delhi had the jurisdiction to entertain an appeal from the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Lucknow in exercise of power under Section 12-AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961? 

The Court was informed that the Judgment of the Delhi High Court in  the case of Indian Trade Promotion Organization relied upon by the respondent authority has been challenged by Special Leave to Appeal and is pending before the Apex Court 

The case is listed for hearing in the month of December, 2016

Note about Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority:
The Government of Uttar Pradesh (GoUP) for implementing the Yamuna Expressway Project and allied development in the region, had constituted the Taj Expressway Industrial Development Authority (now Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority) on  24th April, 2001, under Uttar Pradesh Industrial Area Development Act, 1976 (U.P. Act No.6 of 1976).

The main responsibilities of the erstwhile TEA (now Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority), inter alia, included:

  • Execution of Yamuna Expressway
  • Acquisition of land for construction of Expressway and area development
  • Preparation of Zonal plan/Master plan for planned development along the Expressway
  • Development of drainage, feeder roads, electrification and other facilities in the area

Approx. 334 villages of District Gautam Budh Nagar, Bulandshahar , Aligarh, Mahamaya Nagar (Hatras), Mathura and Agra have been Notified under Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority vide various Notifications of Government of Uttar Pradesh.

Share

Recent Posts

  • ICAI

Empanelment of ICAI Exam observer for January 2027 Examinations. Last date: 20.11.2026

Empanelment to act as ICAI exam observers for January 2027 CA Examination. Last date to apply is 20.11.2026 Empanelment of…

10 hours ago
  • GST

No arrest under GST- Major decision of 57th Meeting of GST Council held on 8th October 2026

No arrest under GST- Major decision taken in 57th Meeting of the GST Council on 8th October 2026 PRESS RELEASE…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Later SC ruling cannot render an act done in compliance of a court order a statutory default

A subsequent Apex Court ruling on the substantive issue cannot retrospectively make an act done in compliance of a binding…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Interest payment on mobilisation advance to NHAI not liable to TDS u/s 194A

Interest payment on mobilisation advance to NHAI not liable for deduction of tax at source u/s 194A - ITAT Interest…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Typographical error in turnover accepted during assessment not a mistake apparent from record

Typographical error in turnover declared in ITR was not as a mistake apparent from the record u/s 154 when AO…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

Plea that assessee was not aware of order cannot be brushed aside in absence of proof of service

Ground taken by assessee that he was not aware of the order cannot be brushed aside so lightly in absence…

5 days ago