Excel for
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Jaipur in a recent judgment reiterated the proposition laid down by Allahabad High Court in Vector Shipping Services Pv. Ltd . (also supported in the case of Merilyn Shipping and transport Pvt. Ltd) that Section 40(a)(ia) disallowance can be made only in respect of amount outstanding (remaining payable) at the end of the year on which TDS is not deducted.
Case Details:
Brief Facts of the Case: It was contended that the Special Leave Petition (SLP) of the Income Tax Department against the judgment of Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in case of Vector Shipping Services Pvt. Ltd. has been dismissed by the Supreme Court. Therefore, the issue should have been decided in favour of the assessee. The assessee also contended that in his own case in the immediate preceding AY 2007-08, CIT(A) the addition by following observations: “However, Sg. N.J. Vyas AR of the assessee has submitted that Hon’ble Apex Court approves the Hon’ble Court’s ruling that disallowance U/s 40(a)(ia) applies only to amounts payable as on 31st March and met to amounts already paid during the year. Further, it is also seen that department’s SLP against this order of Hon’ble Allahabad High court in case of Vector Shipping Services Pvt. Ltd. (supra) has already been dismissed, meaning thereby, Hon’ble Apex Court has approved the judgment of Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in case of Vector Shipping Services Pvt. Ltd. and also the case of Merilyn Shipping and transport Pvt. Ltd., wherein it has been held that disallowance U/s 40(a)(ia) applies only to amounts payable as on 31st March but not to amounts already paid during the year.”
Excerpt from ITAT Judgment Download Full Judgment Click Here >>
|