Bid Rigging-CCI order against Grasim Industries Limited, Aditya Birla Chemicals Gujarat Alkalies and Chemicals Ltd. for bid rigging Delhi Jal Board tenders
Press Information Bureau
Government of India
Ministry of Corporate Affairs
05-October-2017 18:38 IST
The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has found Grasim Industries Limited (GIL), Aditya Birla Chemicals (India) Ltd. (ABCIL) and Gujarat Alkalies and Chemicals Ltd. (GACL)to be in contravention of the provisions of Section 3(1) read with Section 3(3)(d) of the Competition Act, 2002 for rigging Delhi Jal Board tenders which were floated for procurement of Poly Aluminium Chloride (PAC) which is used for purification of water.
The final order has been passed today on a reference filed by Delhi Jal Board (DJB).
While rejecting the plea of being single economic entity taken by GIL and ABCIL, CCI noted in the order that these two companies are not only separate legal entities but also have participated in these tenders individually and separately. Further, CCI noted that the concept of single economic entity has no application in the context of the proceedings initiated under Section 3(3) of the Act, especially in a case of bid rigging/collusive bidding.
Apart from issuing a cease and desist order against the above companies, CCI has imposed a penalty of Rs. 2.30 crore, Rs. 2.09 crore and Rs. 1.88 crore upon GIL, ABCIL and GACL for the anti-competitive conduct. The penalty has been levied @ 8 % of the average relevant turnover of GIL and ABCIL of preceding three years. In case of GACL, penalty has been levied @ 6 % of the average relevant turnover of preceding three years. The conduct of GIL and ABCIL was noted by the Commission as egregious as these companies while apparently submitting separate bids, prepared and finalised the same through common channels creating a façade of competitive landscape.
Vide separate order passed in another reference filed by DJB in respect of alleged bid rigging in the tenders floated for Liquid Chlorine- another chemical used for purification of water, CCI found no contravention as no analysis was done by the Director General with respect to basic price, transportation cost, taxes and policy of profit margin of the parties as was done in the previous reference.
A copy of the CCI’s order passed in Ref. Case Nos. 03 & 04 of 2013 has been uploaded on the website of CCI at www.cci.gov.in.
****
DSM/SBS
Assessee cannot be given a second innings to make good its case - ITAT declines to remand the case second…
When cash deposits represent business receipts, income to be estimated by applying a reasonable profit rate. In a recent judgment,…
Every resolution plan to include a statement of beneficial-ownership of all natural persons who ultimately owns or controls the resolution…
Change in the address of Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad with effect from 11.12.2025 Ministry of Finance(Department of Financial Service)…
Updated list of banks authorised by Reserve Bank of India to import only gold for FY 2025-26 with effect from…
Under percentage completion method, selling/Admin costs are allowable despite no revenue declared as per guidance note of ICAI. In a…