MCA

Bid Rigging-CCI order against big and famous companies for rigging Delhi Jal Board tenders

Bid Rigging-CCI order against Grasim Industries Limited, Aditya Birla Chemicals Gujarat Alkalies and Chemicals Ltd. for bid rigging Delhi Jal Board tenders

Press Information Bureau 
Government of India
Ministry of Corporate Affairs

05-October-2017 18:38 IST

CCI issues order against Grasim Industries Limited, Aditya Birla Chemicals (India) Ltd. and Gujarat Alkalies and Chemicals Ltd. for bid rigging Delhi Jal Board tenders for supply of Poly Aluminium Chloride;Imposes penalty of Rs. 2.30 crore, Rs. 2.09 crore and Rs. 1.88 crore upon GIL, ABCIL and GACL for the anti-competitive conduct. 

The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has found Grasim Industries Limited (GIL), Aditya Birla Chemicals (India) Ltd. (ABCIL) and Gujarat Alkalies and Chemicals Ltd. (GACL)to be in contravention  of the provisions of Section 3(1) read with Section 3(3)(d) of the Competition Act, 2002 for rigging Delhi Jal Board tenders which were floated for procurement of Poly Aluminium Chloride  (PAC) which is used for purification of water.  

The final order has been passed today on a reference filed by Delhi Jal Board (DJB).

While rejecting the plea of being single economic entity taken by GIL and ABCIL, CCI noted in the order that these two companies are not only separate legal entities but also have participated in these tenders individually and separately. Further, CCI noted that the concept of single economic entity has no application in the context of the proceedings initiated under Section 3(3) of the Act, especially in a case of bid rigging/collusive bidding.

Apart from issuing a cease and desist order against the above companies, CCI has imposed a penalty of Rs. 2.30 crore, Rs. 2.09 crore and Rs. 1.88 crore upon GIL, ABCIL  and GACL   for the anti-competitive conduct. The penalty has been levied @ 8 % of the average relevant turnover of GIL and ABCIL of preceding three years. In case of GACL, penalty has been levied @ 6 % of the average relevant turnover of preceding three years. The conduct of GIL and ABCIL was noted by the Commission as egregious as these companies while apparently submitting separate bids, prepared and finalised the same through common channels creating a façade of competitive landscape.

Vide separate order passed in another reference filed by DJB in respect of alleged bid rigging in the tenders floated for Liquid Chlorine- another chemical used for purification of water, CCI found no contravention as no analysis was done by the Director General with respect to basic price, transportation cost, taxes and policy of profit margin of the parties as was done in the previous reference.

A copy of the CCI’s order passed in Ref. Case Nos. 03 & 04 of 2013 has been uploaded on the website of CCI at www.cci.gov.in.

****

DSM/SBS

Share

Recent Posts

  • bankruptcy

SC express concern over AI generated judgments/paragraphs escaping scrutiny by NCLT/NCLAT

Supreme Court expresses serious concerns over AI generated judgments/paragraphs relied upon by the NCLT/NCLAT In a recent judgment, the Hon'ble…

10 hours ago
  • ICAI

ICAI to take disciplinary action for quoting very low & incommensurate fee by Chartered Accountants

ICAI to take disciplinary action for quoting very low and incommensurate fee by Chartered Accountants As per the announcement made…

11 hours ago
  • Income Tax

NSDL latest e-TDS TCS RPU Version 6.00 and FVU 9.5 RPU V 1.0 from Tax Year 2026-27 – Download

NSDL latest e-TDS TCS RPU Version 6.0 from FY 2007-08 NSDL has revised the e-TDS TCS RPU utility for preparing…

14 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Requirement for filing Form 67 for claiming FTC only directory not mandatory – ITAT

Requirement for filing Form 67 for claiming Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) is only directory and not mandatory - ITAT In…

22 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Limitation to invoke power u/s 263 for issues not covered in re-assessment start from original assessment – ITAT

Limitation for invoking revisional jurisdiction u/s 263 with respect to issues not covered in re-assessment would start from the original…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without reference to DVO – ITAT

AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without making a reference to the DVO - ITAT In a recent…

1 week ago