Companies may accept deposits without deposit insurance contract till 31-03-2018 or till the availability of deposit insurance product, whichever is earlier
TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE OF INDIA EXTRAORDINARY, PART II, SECTION 3, SUB-SECTION:(i)]
Government of India
Ministry of Corpora Affairs
Notification
New Delhi, dated, the May, 2017
G.S.R._(E). – In exercise of the powers conferred by sections 73 and 76 read with sub-section (1) and sub-section (2) of section 469 of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 2014, namely:-
1. (1) These rules may be called the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Amendment Rules, 2017
(2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.
2. ln the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 2014 (hereinafter referred to as the principal rules),-
(a) In rule 2, in sub-rule (1), in clause (c), in sub-clause (xviii), after the words “Domestic Venture Capital Funds “the words”, Infrastructure Investment Trusts” shall be inserted.
(b) in rule 5, in sub-rule (1), for the proviso, the following proviso shall be substituted, namely:-
“Provided that the companies may accept deposits without deposit insurance contract till the 31st March, 2018 or till the availability of deposit insurance product, whichever is earlier.”.
[File No. 1/8/2013-CL-V]
(Amardeep Singh Bhatia)
joint Secretary to the Government of lndia
Addition cannot be made in the hands of the assessee solely on the basis of uncorroborated loose-sheet - ITAT In…
ITAT dismisses claim of Leave Encashment exemption u/s 10(10AA)(ii) beyond Rs. 3 lakhs In a recent judgment, ITAT Ahmedabad has…
Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…
Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…
When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…
ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…