Attachment of property during PMLA investigation to be 365 day from 20.03.2019

Attachment of property during PMLA investigation to be 365 day instead of 90 days from 20.03.2019 Notification

MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)

Notification No. 1/2019

New Delhi, the 19th March, 2019

G.S.R. 225(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 22 of the Finance Act, 2019 (7 of 2019), the Central Government hereby appoints the 20th day of March, 2019, as the date on which the provisions of section 22 in Part II, of the said Act shall come into force.

[F.No.P-13011/1/2017-ES Cell-DOR]

BIPLAB KUMAR NASKAR, Under Secy.

Author’s Note:

Clause 22 of the Finance Act 2019 amended sub-section (3) of section 8 of the Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002 so as to extend the time limit of ninety days for which the attachment shall remain valid during the period of investigation to three hundred and sixty-five days and also to provide that in computing the period of three hundred and sixty-five days, the period during which the investigation is stayed by any court shall be excluded.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

2 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

6 days ago