Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002

PMLA-Banks, financial institution to send client KYC records to Central Registry within 10 days

PMLA-Banks, financial institution to send client KYC records to Central Registry within 10 days. the Prevention of Money-laundering (Maintenance of Records) Second Amendment Rules, 2018

Under sub rule (1A) of Rule 9 of the Prevention of Money-laundering (Maintenance of Records) Rules, 2005, every reporting entity ( banking company, financial institution, intermediary or a person carrying on a designated business or profession) is required to file the electronic copy of the client’s KYC records with the Central KYC Records Registry shall within three days after the commencement of an account-based relationship with a client.

 

MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)

NOTIFICATION

New Delhi, the 31st October, 2018

G.S.R. 1078(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1), read with clauses (i), (j), (jj), (jjj) and (k) of sub-section (2) of section 73 of the Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002 (15 of 2003), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Prevention of Money-laundering (Maintenance of Records) Rules, 2005, namely:—

1. (1) These rules may be called the Prevention of Money-laundering (Maintenance of Records) Second Amendment Rules, 2018.

(2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.

2. In the Prevention of Money-laundering (Maintenance of Records) Rules, 2005, in rule 9, in sub-rule (1A), for the words “three days”, the words “ten days”, shall be substituted.

[F.No.P.12011/5/2011-SO(ES Cell)-Part 3]
BIPLAB KUMAR NASKAR, Under Secy.

Note: The principal rules were published in Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (i) vide number G.S.R. 444 (E), dated the 1st July, 2005 and subsequently amended vide number G.S.R. 717 (E), dated the 13th December, 2005, number G.S.R. 389 (E), dated the 24th May, 2007, number G.S.R.816 (E), dated the 12th November, 2009, number G.S.R. 76 (E), dated the 12th February, 2010, number G.S.R. 508 (E), dated the 16th June, 2010, number G.S.R. 980 (E), dated the 16th December, 2010, number G.S.R. 481 (E), dated the 24th June, 2011, number G.S.R. 576 (E), dated the 27th August, 2013, number G.S.R. 288 (E), dated the 15th April, 2015, number G.S.R. 544 (E), dated the 7th July, 2015, number G.S.R. 693 (E), dated the 11th September, 2015, number G.S.R. 730 (E), dated the 22nd September, 2015, number G.S.R. 882 (E), dated the 18th November, 2015, number G.S.R. 347 (E), dated the 12th April, 2017, number G.S.R. 538 (E), dated the 1st June, 2017, number G.S.R. 1038 (E), dated the 21st August, 2017, number G.S.R. 1057 (E), dated the 23rd August, 2017, number G.S.R. 1300 (E), dated the 16th October, 2017, number G.S.R. 1318 (E), dated the 23rd October, 2017, number G.S.R. 1506 (E), dated the 12th December, 2017 and number G.S.R. 456(E) dated 16th May 2018.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

2 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

6 days ago