Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002

Time Limit to report Aadhaar and PAN to banks etc under PMLA extended/postponed indefinitely

Time limit to report Aadhaar and PAN to banks etc extended/postponed indefinitely. Earlier the deadline for existing was 31st December 2017 or six months for existing clients. 

MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)

Notification No. 9/2017

New Delhi, the 12th December, 2017

G.S.R. 1506(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) read with clause (i), clause (j), clause (jj) and clause (k) of sub-section (2) of section 73 of the Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002 (15 of 2003), the Central Government in consultation with the Reserve Bank of India hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Prevention of Money-laundering (Maintenance of Records) Rules, 2005, namely:—

1. (1) These rules may be called the Prevention of Money-laundering (Maintenance of Records) Seventh Amendment Rules, 2017.

(2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.

2. In the Prevention of Money-laundering (Maintenance of Records) Rules, 2005, in rule 9,—

(a) in sub-rule (17),—

(i) in the proviso to clause (a), for the words, figures and letters “submit the Aadhaar number and Permanent Account Number by 31st December, 2017”, the following words, letters and figures shall be substituted, namely:—

“submit the Aadhaar number, and Permanent Account Number or Form No. 60, by such date as may be notified by the Central Government”;

(ii) for the proviso to clause (c), the following proviso shall be substituted, namely:—

“Provided that in case the client already having an account based relationship with reporting entities prior to the date of publication of this notification in the official Gazette fails to submit the Aadhaar number and Permanent Account Number by such date as may be notified by the Central Government, the said account shall cease to be operational till the time the Aadhaar Number and Permanent Account Number is submitted by the client.”

[F. No. P.12011/11/2016-ES Cell-DoR]

BIPLAB KUMAR NASKAR,
Under Secy.

—————— End of Notification ——————

Note:
Under Rule 9 related to Client Due Diligence, in case the client, eligible to be enrolled for Aadhaar and obtain a Permanent Account Number, does not submit the Aadhaar number or the Permanent Account Number at the time of commencement of an account based relationship with a reporting entity, the client shall submit the same within a period of six months from the date of the commencement of the account based relationship. However, the clients, eligible to be enrolled for Aadhaar and obtain the Permanent Account Number, already having an account based relationship with reporting entities prior to 1st June, 2017, the client were required to submit the Aadhaar number and Permanent Account Number by 31st December, 2017.

Further, as per Rule 17(a), in case the client fails to submit the Aadhaar number and Permanent Account Number within the six months period, the said account shall cease to be operational till the time the Aadhaar number and Permanent Account Number is submitted by the client.

 

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Assessee developing infrastructure facility of Govt. not contractor for denying 80IA deduction

Whether an assessee developing an infrastructure facility of Government is a contractor and ineligible for claim of deduction under Section…

12 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Jurisdictional PCIT/CIT to condone delay in filing Form No. 10A for Registration u/s 12A

Jurisdictional Principal Commissioner of Income-tax or Commissioner of Income-tax to condone delay in filing Form No. 10A for Registration u/s…

15 hours ago
  • Income Tax

AO not justified in making addition by adopting extrapolation without any material evidence

AO was not justified in making addition by adopting method of extrapolation without bringing any material evidence in support -…

2 days ago
  • bankruptcy

Court can not sit over comparative financial attractiveness of rival offers decided by CoC

Court can not sit over comparative financial attractiveness of rival offers or to substitute its own view for the decision…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

When quantum appeal restored, penalty can’t be levied for non-payment of demand

When quantum appeal stands restored to the AO, penalty can not be levied u/s 221(1) of the Income Tax Act…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Even in case of bogus purchases, entire purchases cannot be disallowed – ITAT

Even if, the assessee is engaged in the bogus purchases, the entire purchases cannot be disallowed - ITAT In a…

5 days ago