PPF

Deemed closure of PPF account on resident becoming non-resident

Deemed closure of PPF account on resident becoming non-resident

MINISTRY OF FINANCE
Department of Economic Affairs

NOTIFICATION

New Delhi, the 3rd October, 2017

G.S.R.1237 (E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 3 of the Public Provident Fund Act, 1968 ( 23 of 1968) , the Central Government hereby makes the following Scheme further to amend the Public Provident Fund Scheme, 1968, namely: –

1. (1) These Scheme may be called the Public Provident Fund (Amendment) Scheme, 2017.

(2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.

2. In the Public Provident Fund Scheme, 1968, in paragraph 3, in sub-paragraph (3), for the proviso, the following proviso shall be substituted, namely:-

“Provided that if a resident who opened an account under this scheme, subsequently becomes a non Resident during the currency of the maturity period, the account shall be deemed to be closed with effect from the day he becomes a non-resident and interest with effect from that date shall be paid at the rate applicable to the Post Office Saving Account up to the last day of the month preceding the month in which the account is actually closed”.

[F. No. 1/10/2016-NS.II]

PRASHANT GOYAL, Jt. Secy.

Note : The Principal Scheme was published in the Gazette of India vide notification number G.S.R. 1136, dated the 15th June,1968 and subsequently amended vide notification numbers G.S.R. 368(E), dated the 1st August,1972, G.S.R. 217(E), dated the 9th March,1979, G.S.R. 271(E), dated the 16th March,1983, G.S.R. 54(E), dated the 7th February, 1984, G.S.R. 895(E), dated the 23rd June,1986, G.S.R. 1013(E), dated the 20th August,1986, G.S.R. 793(E), dated the 29th August, 1989, G.S.R. 477(E), dated the 26th May,1994, G.S.R. 489(E), dated the 6th July,1999, G.S.R. 908(E)

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

14 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

3 days ago
  • GST

A bland statement of ‘fraud or concealment of facts” in GST Notice u/s 74 not sufficient – SC

In GST Notice u/s 74, allegations should emanate from itself, a bland statement of ‘fraud or concealment of facts” not…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

For claiming deduction u/s 57(iii), test is of purpose and connection, not actual yield – ITAT

For claiming deduction u/s 57(iii) a reasonable and intelligible nexus should be established between the expenditure incurred and the income…

6 days ago