PPF

Premature Closure of PPF Account Conditions-Deductions. Withdrawal for Treatment of Disease or Higher Education after five Financial years

Premature Closure of PPF Account Conditions-Deductions

Ministry of Finance
Department of Economic Affairs

Notification

New Delhi, the 18th June, 2016

GSR….(E) In exercise of the powers conferred under sub-section of (4) of section 3 of the Public Provident Fund Act, 1968 (23 of 1968), the Central Government hereby makes the following schemes further to amend the Public Provident Fund Scheme, 1968, namely:-

1. (1) This Scheme may be called Public Provident Fund (Amendment) Scheme, 2016
(2) It shall come into force on the date of its publication in the Official Gazette.

2. In the Public Provident Fund Scheme, 1968, in paragraph 9, for sub-rule 3(C), the following sub-paragraph shall be substituted, namely:-

 ” 3(C) A subscriber shall be allowed premature closure of his account or the account of a minor of whom he is a guardian, on a written application to the Accounts Office, on any of the following grounds, namely,

(i) that the amount is required for the treatment of serious ailements or life threatening diseases of the account holder, spouse or dependent children or parents, on production of  supporting  documents   from   competent medical authority.

(ii) that  the amount  is required for higher education of the account holder or the minor account holder, on production of documents and fee bills in confirmation of admission in a recognised institute of higher education in India or abroad:

Provided that such premature closure shall be allowed only after the account has completed five financial years.

Provided further that premature closure under this sub-paragraph shall be subject to deduction of such amount which shall be equivalent to one percent less interest on the interest rates as applicable from time to time in the table payable on the deposits held in the account from the date of opening of the account till the date of such premature closure, calculated in accordance with the sample calculation as shown in the table on the next page.

Calculation showing the interest payable to depositor

Year Opening Balance Assumed Fresh Deposits Total Amount Rate of Interest 1% less on the applicable rate of interest Interest accrued Outstanding Balance
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)
2006-07 1000.00 1000.00 8.0 7.0 70.00 1070.00
2007-08 1070.00 500.00 1570.00 8.0 7.0 109.90 1679.90
2008-09 1679.90 500.00 2179.90 8.0 7.7 167.85 2347.75
2009-10 2347.75 700.00 3047.75 8.0 7.0 213.34 3261.09
2010-11 3261.09 600.00 3861.09 8.0 7.0 270.28 4131.37
2011-12 4131.37 1000.00 5131.37 8.6 7.6 389.98 5521.36
2012-13 5521.36 1200.00 6721.36 8.8 7.8 524.27 7245.62
2013-14 7245.62 1500.00 8745.62 8.7 7.7 673.41 9419.03
2014-15 9419.03 1500.00 10919.03 8.7 7.7 840.77 11759.80
2015-16 11759.80 1000.00 12759.80 8.7 7.7 982.50 13742.30

Total

9500.00

13742.30

F. No. 1/04/2016-NS.II

Prashant Goyal
Joint Secretary

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • Companies Act

Change in the constitution of Appellate Authority for CAs CSs and Cost Accountants

Change in the constitution of Appellate Authority for CAs CSs and Cost Accountants In 2015, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs…

3 hours ago
  • VAT

Trade Tax refund withheld beyond stipulated period & adjusted from demand unjustified – SC

Trade Tax Department was unjustified in retaining refund beyond stipulated period and adjusting it against default notices issued subsequently. In…

3 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income assessee is invalid

Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income by the assessee was invalid. Before filing ITR provisions…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Order u/s 148A(d) passed against non-existent entity is bad in eyes of law – High Court

Order u/s 148A(d) passed against non-existent entity is bad in eyes of law. Mere activation of PAN not give right…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Tax authorities not bound with provisions of section 44AE once assessee waived option

Tax authorities not bound with provisions of section 44AE of the Act once assessee waived the option available In a…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Whether seized document is incriminating or not is a findings of fact – High Court

Whether seized document is incriminating or not is definitely a findings of fact – High Court In a recent judgment,…

2 days ago