PPF

Premature Closure of PPF Account Conditions-Deductions. Withdrawal for Treatment of Disease or Higher Education after five Financial years

Premature Closure of PPF Account Conditions-Deductions

Ministry of Finance
Department of Economic Affairs

Notification

New Delhi, the 18th June, 2016

GSR….(E) In exercise of the powers conferred under sub-section of (4) of section 3 of the Public Provident Fund Act, 1968 (23 of 1968), the Central Government hereby makes the following schemes further to amend the Public Provident Fund Scheme, 1968, namely:-

1. (1) This Scheme may be called Public Provident Fund (Amendment) Scheme, 2016
(2) It shall come into force on the date of its publication in the Official Gazette.

2. In the Public Provident Fund Scheme, 1968, in paragraph 9, for sub-rule 3(C), the following sub-paragraph shall be substituted, namely:-

 ” 3(C) A subscriber shall be allowed premature closure of his account or the account of a minor of whom he is a guardian, on a written application to the Accounts Office, on any of the following grounds, namely,

(i) that the amount is required for the treatment of serious ailements or life threatening diseases of the account holder, spouse or dependent children or parents, on production of  supporting  documents   from   competent medical authority.

(ii) that  the amount  is required for higher education of the account holder or the minor account holder, on production of documents and fee bills in confirmation of admission in a recognised institute of higher education in India or abroad:

Provided that such premature closure shall be allowed only after the account has completed five financial years.

Provided further that premature closure under this sub-paragraph shall be subject to deduction of such amount which shall be equivalent to one percent less interest on the interest rates as applicable from time to time in the table payable on the deposits held in the account from the date of opening of the account till the date of such premature closure, calculated in accordance with the sample calculation as shown in the table on the next page.

Calculation showing the interest payable to depositor

Year Opening Balance Assumed Fresh Deposits Total Amount Rate of Interest 1% less on the applicable rate of interest Interest accrued Outstanding Balance
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)
2006-07 1000.00 1000.00 8.0 7.0 70.00 1070.00
2007-08 1070.00 500.00 1570.00 8.0 7.0 109.90 1679.90
2008-09 1679.90 500.00 2179.90 8.0 7.7 167.85 2347.75
2009-10 2347.75 700.00 3047.75 8.0 7.0 213.34 3261.09
2010-11 3261.09 600.00 3861.09 8.0 7.0 270.28 4131.37
2011-12 4131.37 1000.00 5131.37 8.6 7.6 389.98 5521.36
2012-13 5521.36 1200.00 6721.36 8.8 7.8 524.27 7245.62
2013-14 7245.62 1500.00 8745.62 8.7 7.7 673.41 9419.03
2014-15 9419.03 1500.00 10919.03 8.7 7.7 840.77 11759.80
2015-16 11759.80 1000.00 12759.80 8.7 7.7 982.50 13742.30

Total

9500.00

13742.30

F. No. 1/04/2016-NS.II

Prashant Goyal
Joint Secretary

Share

Recent Posts

  • Service Tax

Demand set aside as assessee for period covered had discharged tax liability under SVLDRS

High Court sets aside demand notices in respect of a period, for which the assessee had discharged tax liability under…

6 hours ago
  • Income Tax

No addition u/s 68 when there is no fresh receipt of unsecured loans during the year

Addition u/s 68 can not be made applicable where there is no fresh receipt of unsecured loans at all during…

8 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Taxes on sales comprising in turnover to be excluded for estimating net profit

Amount of taxes on sales comprising in turnover to be excluded while computing gross receipts for estimating net profit -…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Capital contribution deposited in assessee’s bank not partnership firm – Addition 69A upheld

Addition u/s 69A confirmed as alleged capital contribution by partners was deposited in bank account of assessee not in account…

1 day ago
  • GST

Bail granted to a CA accused in a GST evasion of more than 40 crores

Allahabad High Court grants bail to Chartered Accountant accused in a GST evasion to the tune of more than 40…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Every provision invoked casts a different onus, quoting wrong section prejudice the assessee

Every provision invoked casts a different sort of onus on the assessee – ITAT deleted addition u/s 69 towards bogus…

2 days ago