Premature Closure of PPF Account Conditions-Deductions
Ministry of Finance
Department of Economic Affairs
Notification
New Delhi, the 18th June, 2016
GSR….(E) In exercise of the powers conferred under sub-section of (4) of section 3 of the Public Provident Fund Act, 1968 (23 of 1968), the Central Government hereby makes the following schemes further to amend the Public Provident Fund Scheme, 1968, namely:-
1. (1) This Scheme may be called Public Provident Fund (Amendment) Scheme, 2016
(2) It shall come into force on the date of its publication in the Official Gazette.
2. In the Public Provident Fund Scheme, 1968, in paragraph 9, for sub-rule 3(C), the following sub-paragraph shall be substituted, namely:-
” 3(C) A subscriber shall be allowed premature closure of his account or the account of a minor of whom he is a guardian, on a written application to the Accounts Office, on any of the following grounds, namely,
(i) that the amount is required for the treatment of serious ailements or life threatening diseases of the account holder, spouse or dependent children or parents, on production of supporting documents from competent medical authority.
(ii) that the amount is required for higher education of the account holder or the minor account holder, on production of documents and fee bills in confirmation of admission in a recognised institute of higher education in India or abroad:
Provided that such premature closure shall be allowed only after the account has completed five financial years.
Provided further that premature closure under this sub-paragraph shall be subject to deduction of such amount which shall be equivalent to one percent less interest on the interest rates as applicable from time to time in the table payable on the deposits held in the account from the date of opening of the account till the date of such premature closure, calculated in accordance with the sample calculation as shown in the table on the next page.
Calculation showing the interest payable to depositor
| Year | Opening Balance | Assumed Fresh Deposits | Total Amount | Rate of Interest | 1% less on the applicable rate of interest | Interest accrued | Outstanding Balance |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) |
| 2006-07 | – | 1000.00 | 1000.00 | 8.0 | 7.0 | 70.00 | 1070.00 |
| 2007-08 | 1070.00 | 500.00 | 1570.00 | 8.0 | 7.0 | 109.90 | 1679.90 |
| 2008-09 | 1679.90 | 500.00 | 2179.90 | 8.0 | 7.7 | 167.85 | 2347.75 |
| 2009-10 | 2347.75 | 700.00 | 3047.75 | 8.0 | 7.0 | 213.34 | 3261.09 |
| 2010-11 | 3261.09 | 600.00 | 3861.09 | 8.0 | 7.0 | 270.28 | 4131.37 |
| 2011-12 | 4131.37 | 1000.00 | 5131.37 | 8.6 | 7.6 | 389.98 | 5521.36 |
| 2012-13 | 5521.36 | 1200.00 | 6721.36 | 8.8 | 7.8 | 524.27 | 7245.62 |
| 2013-14 | 7245.62 | 1500.00 | 8745.62 | 8.7 | 7.7 | 673.41 | 9419.03 |
| 2014-15 | 9419.03 | 1500.00 | 10919.03 | 8.7 | 7.7 | 840.77 | 11759.80 |
| 2015-16 | 11759.80 | 1000.00 | 12759.80 | 8.7 | 7.7 | 982.50 | 13742.30 |
|
Total |
9500.00 |
13742.30 |
F. No. 1/04/2016-NS.II
Prashant Goyal
Joint Secretary
Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…
Lokayukta Police not an ‘intelligence and security’ organisation and hence not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005…
Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST – case remanded for determination In a recent…
CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…
Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act. Courts to award a composite…
CIT Revision notice u/s 263 quashed as the Assessing Officer rightly taken DVO value of property sold as actual sale…