SEBI

Listed entities to disclose details of approved resolution plan under Insolvency Code

Listed entities to disclose details of approved resolution plan under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) 2016 – SEBI
 
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA
 
NOTIFICATION
 
Mumbai, the 8th January, 2021

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA (LISTING OBLIGATIONS AND DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS) (AMENDMENT) REGULATIONS, 2021

No. SEBI/LAD-NRO/GN/2021/02.—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 11, sub-section (2) of section 11A and section 30 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (15 of 1992) read with section 31 of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 (42 of 1956), the Board hereby makes the following regulations to further amend the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015, namely:-
 
1. These regulations may be called the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements)(Amendment) Regulations, 2021.
 
2. They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.
 
3. In the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015,-
 
I. In Schedule III, in Part A, –
 
a. under point A, in clause 16,the existing sub-clause (l) shall be substituted with the following, namely, -―
 
“(l) Specific features and details of the resolution plan as approved by the Adjudicating Authority under the Insolvency Code, not involving commercial secrets, including details such as:
 
(i) Pre and Post net-worth of the company;
(ii) Details of assets of the company post CIRP;
(iii) Details of securities continuing to be imposed on the companies’ assets;
(iv)Other material liabilities imposed on the company;
(v) Detailed pre and post shareholding pattern assuming 100% conversion of convertible securities;
(vi) Details of funds infused in the company, creditors paid-off;
(vii) Additional liability on the incoming investors due to the transaction, source of such funding etc.;
(viii) Impact on the investor –revised P/E, RONW ratios etc.;
(ix) Names of the new promoters, key managerial persons(s), if any and their past experience in the business or employment. In case where promoters are companies, history of such company and names of natural persons in control;
(x) Brief description of business strategy.
 
 
b. under point A, in clause 16, after the existing sub-clause (m), the following new sub-clauses shall be inserted, namely, -―
 
“n) Proposed steps to be taken by the incoming investor/acquirer for achieving the MPS;
o) Quarterly disclosure of the status of achieving the MPS;
p) The details as to the delisting plans, if any approved in the resolution plan.”
 
AJAY TYAGI, Chairman
[ADVT.-III/4/Exty./442/2020-21]

Download Notification Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

2 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

6 days ago