Portfolio manager to obtain prior approval of SEBI in case of change in control. SEBI amends conditions for registration of portfolio managers
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA
NOTIFICATION
Mumbai, the 26th April, 2021
No. SEBI/LAD-NRO/GN/2021/16.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 30 read with sub-section (1) of section 11, clause (b) of sub-section (2) of Section 11 and sub-section (1) of Section 12 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (15 of 1992), the Securities and Exchange Board of India hereby makes the following regulations to further amend the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Portfolio Managers) Regulations, 2020, namely:–
1.These Regulations may be called the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Portfolio Managers) (Second Amendment) Regulations, 2021.
2. They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.
3. In the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Portfolio Managers) Regulations, 2020,-
I In regulation 11 after clause (a) and before clause (b) the following clause shall be inserted, namely,-
“(aa) the portfolio manager shall obtain prior approval of the Board in case of change in control in such manner as may be specified by the Board”
AJAY TYAGI, Chairman
[ADVT.-III/4/Exty./47/2021-22]
Footnote: 1.The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Portfolio Managers) Regulations, 2020, were published in the Gazette of India on January 16, 2020 vide No. SEBI/LAD-NRO/GN/2020/03.
2. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Portfolio Managers) Regulations, 2020 were subsequently amended on, –
a. 17th April, 2020 by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Regulatory Sandbox) (Amendment) Regulations, 2020 vide No. SEBI/LAD-NRO/GN/2020/10.
Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…
Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…
When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…
ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…
Where proceedings u/s 153C are barred by limitation, AO can not reopen the case invoking section 148 and 148A of…
Corporate guarantees executed by the corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC and banks to be recognized as financial creditors…