SEBI fixes responsibility for use of artificial intelligence and machine learning tools and techniques
SEBI has notified he Securities and Exchange Board of India (Intermediaries) (Amendment) Regulations, 2025 to regulate use of artificial intelligence
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Intermediaries) Regulations, 2008 has been amended by adding a new Chapter IIIB related to use of artificial intelligence.
Responsibility for the use of artificial intelligence.
It has been provided that every person regulated by the SEBI who uses artificial intelligence and machine learning tools and techniques, either designed by it or procured from third-party technology service providers, irrespective of the scale and scenario of adoption of such tools for conducting its business and servicing its investors, shall be solely responsible –
(a) for the privacy, security and integrity of investors’ and stakeholders’ data including data maintained by it in a fiduciary capacity throughout the processes involved;
(b) for the output arising from the usage of such tools and techniques it relies upon or deals with; and
(c) for the compliance with applicable laws in force.
The expression “artificial intelligence and machine learning tools and techniques” has been defined to include any application or software program or executable system or a combination thereof, offered by the person regulated by SEBI to investors/stakeholders or used internally by it to facilitate investing and trading or to disseminate investment strategies and advice or to carry out its activities including compliance requirements and the same are portrayed as part of the products offered to the public or under usage for compliance or management or other business purposes;
In case of violation of the provisions related to AI SEBI is authorised to take action under these regulations.
Download SEBI AI Notification Click Here >>
Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…
Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…
When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…
ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…
Where proceedings u/s 153C are barred by limitation, AO can not reopen the case invoking section 148 and 148A of…
Corporate guarantees executed by the corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC and banks to be recognized as financial creditors…