SEBI

SEBI warns Mr. Saravana R an unregistered investment advisor at Cosmofeed

SEBI warns Mr. Saravana R an unregistered investment advisor at Cosmofeed platform

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) issued a warning to Saravana R, Bengaluru associated with Cosmofeed, due to his involvement in providing unauthorized investment advice through social media platforms

Cosmofeed is an all-in-one platform designed for content creators, solopreneurs, and digital entrepreneurs to monetize their content and engage with their communities. Founded in 2021 by Vivek Yadav and Vishnu Pathak in Bengaluru, India, it offers a suite of tools to help creators build, manage, and monetize their online presence. Its flagship product, SuperProfile, enables users to create a centralized hub for their social media links, communities, and events, streamlining audience interaction and content distribution.

As per the warning letter issued to Mr. Saravana R, SEBI has found him involved in providing unregistered investment advisory and research analyst related services in securities market through “cosmofeed” platform without obtaining registration from SEBI under the capacity of Investment Advisor/Research Analyst. It has been stated that the unregistered activity of Mr. Saravana R amounts to violation of various provisions of SEBI Act, 1992, SEBI Regulations and Circulars made thereunder.

Earlier, the SEBI’s issued a cautionary notice highlighting a surge in fraudulent activities on platforms like YouTube, WhatsApp, and Telegram, where such unregistered individuals were offering stock tips and trading calls without proper registration. These actions misled investors with promises of guaranteed or risk-free returns, often falsely claiming SEBI affiliation.

The SEBI has directed Saravana to cease offering such advice and not to indulge any kind of unregistered security market activity failing which action shall be initiated against him.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

ITR was not non est for no e-verification when AO took cognizance of returned income

Return could not be said to be non est for non e-verification when AO had been taken due cognizance of…

17 minutes ago
  • Income Tax

Section 43CB & ICDS-III is applicable to contractors not to real estate developers

Section 43CB read with ICDS-III is applicable to contractors and not real estate developers - ITAT In a recent judgment,…

5 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Expenses of ESOP are allowable as revenue expenditure u/s 37(1) of Income Tax Act.

Expenses incurred on ESOP are allowable as revenue expenditure u/s 37(1) of Income Tax Act – ITAT Delhi In a…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Compliance history of supplier can’t be used to invalidate genuine business transactions of buyer

Compliance history of supplier could not be used to invalidate the genuine business transactions of the buyer especially when the…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Reassessment quashed as AO issued notice u/s 148 instead of 153C as reopening was based on search

Reassessment quashed as AO issued u/s 148 instead of 153C as reopening was based on incriminating material found during search…

1 day ago
  • Empanelment

Empanelment of CA/CMA /Legal firm for FEMA & other allied services at EPIL

Empanelment of Chartered Accountants/Cost Accountant/Legal firm for FEMA & other allied services Engineering Projects (India) Ltd. has invited application for…

1 day ago