Service Tax

Service tax Determination of Value Rule not to apply to service provided by Govt./local authority where payment deferred for interest/other consideration

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE)

 Notification No. 23 /2016-Service Tax,

 New Delhi, the 13th April, 2016

G.S.R.____ (E).- In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (aa) of sub-section (2) of section 94 of the Finance Act,1994 (32 of 1994), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006, namely:–

1. (1) These rules may be called the Service Tax (Determination of Value) Amendment Rules, 2016.

(2)  They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.

 2. In rule 6, in sub-rule (2), in clause (iv), the following proviso shall be inserted namely:-

“Provided that this clause shall not apply to any service provided by Government or a local authority to a business entity where payment for such service is allowed to be deferred on payment of interest or any other consideration.”.

[F. No. 334 / 8 /2016 -TRU]

(Mohit Tiwari)
Under Secretary to the Government of India

 Note:- The principal rules were published vide notification No.12/2006-Service Tax, dated the 19th  April, 2006, in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, vide number G.S.R.228 (E), dated the 19th April, 2006 and last amended by notification No.11/2014-Service Tax, dated the 11th July, 2014, vide number G.S.R.480(E),dated the 11th July, 2014.

Share

Recent Posts

  • RTI

Lokayukta Police not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005 – SC

Lokayukta Police not an ‘intelligence and security’ organisation  and hence not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST – case remanded for determination In a recent…

4 days ago
  • ICAI

CA Misconduct – Order quashed as judgment not passed by same members who heard arguments.

CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…

6 days ago
  • Insurance

Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act – SC

Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act. Courts to award a composite…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

CIT notice u/s 263 quashed as AO rightly took DVO value of property as actual sale price

CIT Revision notice u/s 263 quashed as the Assessing Officer rightly taken DVO value of property sold as actual sale…

1 week ago
  • GST

Extension of timeline for implementation of Ship To GSTIN & Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities

Extension of timeline for implementation of mandatory "Ship To GSTIN" and Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities GSTN Advisory dated…

1 week ago