GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE)
Notification No. 23 /2016-Service Tax,
New Delhi, the 13th April, 2016
G.S.R.____ (E).- In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (aa) of sub-section (2) of section 94 of the Finance Act,1994 (32 of 1994), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006, namely:–
1. (1) These rules may be called the Service Tax (Determination of Value) Amendment Rules, 2016.
(2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.
2. In rule 6, in sub-rule (2), in clause (iv), the following proviso shall be inserted namely:-
“Provided that this clause shall not apply to any service provided by Government or a local authority to a business entity where payment for such service is allowed to be deferred on payment of interest or any other consideration.”.
[F. No. 334 / 8 /2016 -TRU]
(Mohit Tiwari)
Under Secretary to the Government of India
Note:- The principal rules were published vide notification No.12/2006-Service Tax, dated the 19th April, 2006, in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, vide number G.S.R.228 (E), dated the 19th April, 2006 and last amended by notification No.11/2014-Service Tax, dated the 11th July, 2014, vide number G.S.R.480(E),dated the 11th July, 2014.
Absence of an explicit irrevocability clause in trust deed no ground for rejecting application for registration or renewal under section…
ITAT allowed increased exemption of Rs. 25 lakhs u/s 10(10A) to non-government employees in view of CBDT retrospective notification. In…
PCIT has revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 over the cases irrespective of the fact that the relevant assessment was completed physical…
Appellate court interfering with Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal findings on assessment of disability and loss of earning capacity must undertake…
When period of delay is not very huge and involve huge monetary liability on the assessee, a lenient approach should…
Ratification by EoGM of the company can not give legality of the diversion of the fund raised by preferential issue.…