Service Tax

No arrest for non payment of service tax without SCN- SC upholds Delhi HC Judgment

No arrest for non payment of service tax without show cause notice – Supreme Court upholds Delhi High Court Judgment  

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2763 (2019) (01) SC

The Delhi High Court had quashed the arrest for non payment of service tax without show cause notice. The High Court had held that the powers exercised u/s 91 without SCN u/s 73A of the Finance Act 1994 was contrary to the law and in violation of constitutional and fundamental rights under Article 21 of the Constitution.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court  observed that the High Court had, after detailed discussion, decided, that it is mandatory to follow the procedure contained in Section 73A(3) and (4) of the said Act before going ahead with the arrest of a person under Sections 90 and 91.

The Apex Court expressed its agreement with the conclusion reached by the Delhi High Court and saw no reason to deviate from it.

In January, 2016, the service tax authorities had arrested the Vice President (Finance) of Make my Trip (MMT).  Searches were also undertaken at IBIBO and Yatra along with Cleartrip.  

The Delhi High Court had examined the scope of powers of search of DGCEI under Section 82 of the Finance Act, and power of arrest and of taking coercive measures for recovery of service tax dues in terms of Section 91 of the FA, without resorting to the issuance of a show cause notice (SCN) under Sections 73 or 73A of the Finance Act.

The Service Tax Authorities had filed a SLP against the said judgment of the Delhi High Court which has been dismissed by the Apex Court.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

ITAT allows exemption of Rs. 25 lakhs u/s 10(10A) to non-government employees

ITAT allowed increased exemption of Rs. 25 lakhs u/s 10(10A) to non-government employees in view of CBDT retrospective notification. In…

21 hours ago
  • Income Tax

PCIT has revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 over the cases passed by the NFAC or the JAO

PCIT has revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 over the cases irrespective of the fact that the relevant assessment was completed physical…

1 day ago
  • Insurance

Appellate court interfering with MACT finding must undertake reappreciation of evidence

Appellate court interfering with Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal findings on assessment of disability and loss of earning capacity must undertake…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

When delay is not huge & involves huge monetary liability, lenient approach to be taken

When period of delay is not very huge and involve huge monetary liability on the assessee, a lenient approach should…

2 days ago
  • SEBI

EoGM of company can not ratify diversion of fund raised by preferential issue – SC

Ratification by EoGM of the company can not give legality of the diversion of the fund raised by preferential issue.…

3 days ago
  • Excise/Custom

Return of export cargo from Hormuz Strait where vessel do not lands at original port

CBIC prescribes procedures for return of export cargo from international waters due to closure of the Strait of Hormuz where…

3 days ago