Service Tax

No arrest for non payment of service tax without SCN- SC upholds Delhi HC Judgment

No arrest for non payment of service tax without show cause notice – Supreme Court upholds Delhi High Court Judgment  

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2763 (2019) (01) SC

The Delhi High Court had quashed the arrest for non payment of service tax without show cause notice. The High Court had held that the powers exercised u/s 91 without SCN u/s 73A of the Finance Act 1994 was contrary to the law and in violation of constitutional and fundamental rights under Article 21 of the Constitution.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court  observed that the High Court had, after detailed discussion, decided, that it is mandatory to follow the procedure contained in Section 73A(3) and (4) of the said Act before going ahead with the arrest of a person under Sections 90 and 91.

The Apex Court expressed its agreement with the conclusion reached by the Delhi High Court and saw no reason to deviate from it.

In January, 2016, the service tax authorities had arrested the Vice President (Finance) of Make my Trip (MMT).  Searches were also undertaken at IBIBO and Yatra along with Cleartrip.  

The Delhi High Court had examined the scope of powers of search of DGCEI under Section 82 of the Finance Act, and power of arrest and of taking coercive measures for recovery of service tax dues in terms of Section 91 of the FA, without resorting to the issuance of a show cause notice (SCN) under Sections 73 or 73A of the Finance Act.

The Service Tax Authorities had filed a SLP against the said judgment of the Delhi High Court which has been dismissed by the Apex Court.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST – case remanded for determination In a recent…

2 days ago
  • ICAI

CA Misconduct – Order quashed as judgment not passed by same members who heard arguments.

CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…

3 days ago
  • Insurance

Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act – SC

Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act. Courts to award a composite…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

CIT notice u/s 263 quashed as AO rightly took DVO value of property as actual sale price

CIT Revision notice u/s 263 quashed as the Assessing Officer rightly taken DVO value of property sold as actual sale…

5 days ago
  • GST

Extension of timeline for implementation of Ship To GSTIN & Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities

Extension of timeline for implementation of mandatory "Ship To GSTIN" and Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities GSTN Advisory dated…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

No protective addition required when additions is confirmed in hands of searched person – ITAT

No protective addition required in the hand of a third party when additions have been confirmed in the hands of…

6 days ago