GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE)
NOTIFICATION No. 33/2016-Service Tax
New Delhi, the 6th June, 2016
G.S.R.____(E).-In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) read with subsection (2) of section 94 of the Finance Act, 1994 (32 of 1994), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Service Tax Rules, 1994, namely:-
1. These rules may be called the Service Tax (Fourth Amendment) Rules, 2016.
2. In the Service Tax Rules, 1994, in rule 2, in sub-rule (1), in clause (d), in sub-clause(i),-
(a) in item (D), for sub-item (II), the following sub-item shall be substituted, namely:-
“(II) an individual advocate or a firm of advocates by way of legal services other than representational services by senior advocates;”
(b) after item (D), the following item shall be inserted, namely:-
“(DD) in relation to service provided or agreed to be provided by a senior advocate by way of representational services before any court, tribunal or authority, directly or indirectly, to any business entity located in the taxable territory, including where contract for provision of such service has been entered through another advocate or a firm of advocates, and the senior advocate is providing such services, the recipient of such services, which is the business entity who is litigant, applicant, or petitioner, as the case may be”.
[F. No. B-1/7/2016-TRU]
(Anurag Sehgal)
Under Secretary
Note:- The principal rules were published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section-3, Sub-section (i) by notification No. 2/94-Service Tax, dated the 28thJune, 1994 vide number G.S.R. 546 (E), dated the 28thJune, 1994 and last amended vide notification No. 31/2016-Service Tax, dated the 26th May, 2016 vide number G.S.R. 554(E), dated the 26th May, 2016.
Non issuance of notice u/s 143(2) for return filed u/s 148 even though belatedly, makes the assessment framed bad in…
Calculation of functional disability depends on assessing the victim’s earning capacity in the open, competitive market – Supreme Court In…
Appeal against every decision of ITAT shall lie only before the High Court within whose jurisdiction the Assessing Officer who…
Supreme Court recommends action against Commissioner of Customs who relied upon non-existent AI generated case laws. Supreme Court recommends action…
ITAT power to pass such orders "as it thinks fit" implies a judicial discretion to be exercised within the parameters…
Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…