GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE)
NOTIFICATION No. 33/2016-Service Tax
New Delhi, the 6th June, 2016
G.S.R.____(E).-In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) read with subsection (2) of section 94 of the Finance Act, 1994 (32 of 1994), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Service Tax Rules, 1994, namely:-
1. These rules may be called the Service Tax (Fourth Amendment) Rules, 2016.
2. In the Service Tax Rules, 1994, in rule 2, in sub-rule (1), in clause (d), in sub-clause(i),-
(a) in item (D), for sub-item (II), the following sub-item shall be substituted, namely:-
“(II) an individual advocate or a firm of advocates by way of legal services other than representational services by senior advocates;”
(b) after item (D), the following item shall be inserted, namely:-
“(DD) in relation to service provided or agreed to be provided by a senior advocate by way of representational services before any court, tribunal or authority, directly or indirectly, to any business entity located in the taxable territory, including where contract for provision of such service has been entered through another advocate or a firm of advocates, and the senior advocate is providing such services, the recipient of such services, which is the business entity who is litigant, applicant, or petitioner, as the case may be”.
[F. No. B-1/7/2016-TRU]
(Anurag Sehgal)
Under Secretary
Note:- The principal rules were published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section-3, Sub-section (i) by notification No. 2/94-Service Tax, dated the 28thJune, 1994 vide number G.S.R. 546 (E), dated the 28thJune, 1994 and last amended vide notification No. 31/2016-Service Tax, dated the 26th May, 2016 vide number G.S.R. 554(E), dated the 26th May, 2016.
Agreement validly terminated prior to initiation of CIRP did not constitute “assets” or “property” of the corporate debtor u/s 14…
Supreme Court explains jurisdiction of courts under NI Act for dishonour of account payee or bearer cheques In a recent…
Advances received in normal course of business and adjusted against sale bills cannot be added u/s 68 of the Income…
Faceless mechanism for income escaping assessment would not exclude the Central charges and International Taxation charges from its application -…
Ground not adjudicated by first appellate authority or ground not originating from first appellate order cannot be decided in second…
High Court directed ITD to consider condonation of delay in filing ITR for four years as the COVID-19 pandemic constituted…