GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE)
NOTIFICATION No. 32/2016-Service Tax,
New Delhi, the 6th June, 2016
G.S.R.….(E).-In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 93 of the Finance Act, 1994 (32 of 1994), the Central Government being satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, hereby makes the following further amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) No.25/2012-Service Tax, dated the 20th June, 2012, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i) vide number G.S.R. 467 (E), dated the 20th June, 2012, namely:-
1. In the said notification, in the first paragraph, in entry 6, for clause (c), the following clause shall be substituted, namely:-
“(c) a senior advocate by way of legal services to-
(i) any person other than a business entity; or
(ii) a business entity with a turnover up to rupees ten lakh in the preceding financial year;”.
[F. No. B-1/7/2016-TRU]
(Anurag Sehgal)
Under Secretary
Note:-The principal notification was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, vide notification No. 25/2012 – Service Tax, dated the 20th June, 2012, vide number G.S.R. 467 (E), dated the 20th June, 2012 and last amended vide notification number 26/2016 – Service Tax, dated the 20th May, 2016 vide number G.S.R. 538, dated the 20th May, 2016.
Agreement validly terminated prior to initiation of CIRP did not constitute “assets” or “property” of the corporate debtor u/s 14…
Supreme Court explains jurisdiction of courts under NI Act for dishonour of account payee or bearer cheques In a recent…
Advances received in normal course of business and adjusted against sale bills cannot be added u/s 68 of the Income…
Faceless mechanism for income escaping assessment would not exclude the Central charges and International Taxation charges from its application -…
Ground not adjudicated by first appellate authority or ground not originating from first appellate order cannot be decided in second…
High Court directed ITD to consider condonation of delay in filing ITR for four years as the COVID-19 pandemic constituted…