Service Tax

Transitional credit for service tax paid after 30 June 2017 – CBEC clarification

Transitional credit for service tax paid after 30 June 2017. CBEC clarification for payment on RCM basis till 5-6 July or afterwards on detection of evasion

Circular 207/5/2017-Service Tax

F.No 137/16/2017 -Service Tax
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Excise and Customs
Service Tax Wing
***

New Delhi dated 28th September 2017

All Principal Chief /Chief Commissioners of GST and Central Excise
All Principal Directors General/Directors General of Systems and Data Management/ GST Intelligence/ Audit

Madam/Sir

Subject: Certain transitional  issues arising with respect to payment  of service tax after 30th June 2017

I am directed to refer to two such issues which have arisen in the above context and to state that these issues have been examined and the following clarifications are issued.

2.0 Reflection of transitional credit arising out of payment of service  tax  on  reverse charge basis after 30th June 2017 and by   5th/6th July 2017

2.1 I am directed to refer to  certain  instances  of  assessees, who  had  chosen  to  wait  till 5th /6th July 2017 to make the payment of service tax on reverse charge basis, instead of paying the same by 30-6-2017. These cases would be ones where the service was received before 1-7-2017 and payment for the value of the service was also made before 1-7-2017. Since the input tax credit in cases of payment under reverse charge would be available only after payment of service tax, these assessees had doubts as to whether the details of credit should be included in the return in Form ST-3 or in Form  GST TRAN-I.

2.2 The matter has been examined . In such cases, details of credit arising as a consequence of payment of service tax on reverse charge basis after 30th June 2017 by 5th/6th July 2017, the details should be indicated in Part I of Form ST-3 in entries, 1.2.6, I3 2.2.6 and I3 3.2.6. Linked entries should be made in Part H of Form ST-3. In case the return has already been filed by or after the due date, these details should be indicated in the revised return, the time for filing of which is 45 days from the date of filing of the return.

2.3 It is necessary to give compliant assessees who had filed their ST 3 return by the due date or some days later, an immediate and viable window in which a revised return can be filed consequent to the issue of this Hence all ST3 returns for the period 1-4-2017 to 30-6-2017 which have been filed upto and inclusive of the 31st day of August 2017, shall be deemed to have been filed on 31-8-2017. This will give all such assessees some more days to file a revised return, if necessitated. Once details of such credit are reflected in the ST-3, the assessee may proceed to fill in the details in Form GST TRAN-1. It may be noted that as on date, GST TRAN-1 can be filed upto 31-10-2017 and can also be revised.

3.0 Payment of service tax on or after 1-7-2017 as a consequence of detection of evasion or any other circumstances

3.1   This issue will arise only in the case of assessees who were not registered under ACES . It may be recalled that in the registration module of ACES , there is a category of “non assessee registration” . This may be used to obtain registration and make payment of service tax. Any difficulty in this regard may be resolved with the office of the Additional Director General , Directorate of Systems and Data Management, Chennai .

4. The contents of this circular may be brought to the notice of assessees by issuing Public/Trade Notices.

Yours faithfully

( Pallabika Dutta )
Deputy Commissioner and OSD Service Tax Wing
Telephone 011-23095438
Email:  commr.st-cbec@gov.in

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Jurisdictional PCIT/CIT to condone delay in filing Form No. 10A for Registration u/s 12A

Jurisdictional Principal Commissioner of Income-tax or Commissioner of Income-tax to condone delay in filing Form No. 10A for Registration u/s…

2 hours ago
  • Income Tax

AO not justified in making addition by adopting extrapolation without any material evidence

AO was not justified in making addition by adopting method of extrapolation without bringing any material evidence in support -…

1 day ago
  • bankruptcy

Court can not sit over comparative financial attractiveness of rival offers decided by CoC

Court can not sit over comparative financial attractiveness of rival offers or to substitute its own view for the decision…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

When quantum appeal restored, penalty can’t be levied for non-payment of demand

When quantum appeal stands restored to the AO, penalty can not be levied u/s 221(1) of the Income Tax Act…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Even in case of bogus purchases, entire purchases cannot be disallowed – ITAT

Even if, the assessee is engaged in the bogus purchases, the entire purchases cannot be disallowed - ITAT In a…

4 days ago
  • SEBI

Order to stock broker by WhatsApp are legally verifiable record – SEBI

Order to stock broker through WhatsApp may be considered as legally verifiable record - SEBI SEBI in an informal guidance…

4 days ago