Tag: bogus purchase

Income Tax assessment order passed u/s 143(3) supports that party was not bogus, very much existed and carried out business – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3701 (2023) (04) ITAT In the instant appeal, the Revenue had challenged the order of CIT(A) in deleting disallowance made by the …

If creditors are found to be bogus, entire purchases to be disallowed and not only balance outstanding – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3647 (2023) (01) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon:Ipsita Naik vs. ITO In the instant case, both the assessee and the Revenue had challenged the …

Rejection of books due to admission of assessee being bogus accommodation entry provider is quiet correct – ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in sustaining the addition on bogus transaction of the assessee. ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3579 (2022) …

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) deleted as quantum addition was reduced significantly from 100% to 20% in respect of bogus purchases. In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) confirming penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) imposed by the …

No arrest under GST Act on purchase of goods against fake invoice unless purchaser took benefit of fake or bogus invoice, e-way bill etc. issued by dealer or he had acted in collusion with it. ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3500 (2021) (05) HC In this case anticipatory bail …

Depreciation disallowed on VAT portion of capital goods suspected to be purchased from grey market ABACUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3364 (2020) (08) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming disallowance of depreciation on capital assets purchased and used …

No disallowance for bogus purchase when there is one to one reconciliation of purchase with sales – ITAT  ABACUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3349 (2020) (07) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Indian Woolen Carpet Factory v. ITAT (2003) 260 ITR 658 (Raj.) (HC)ITO vs. M/s. Super …

Profit on Bogus purchase/ accommodation entries @ 5% upheld by the High Court. Only profit element embedded is to be taxed not entire purchase ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3272 (2020) (02) HC Important case law relied upon by the parties:Kaveri Rice Mills vs. Commissioner of Income-Tax, (2006)157 Taxman …

Penalty for fake invoice. New Section 271AAD. Penalty for false entry, etc. in books of account With the launch of Goods & Services Tax (GST), several cases of fraudulent input tax credit (ITC) claim have been caught by the GST authorities. In these cases, fake invoices are obtained …

Addition for bogus purchase deleted as AO conducted enquiry u/s 133(6) from the different supplier having name similar to actual creditor ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3206 (2019) (12) ITAT In the instant case, the appeal was filed by the assessee against the order of CIT(A) on the solitary …