Trade Mark

CGPDTM cautions about illegal activities of OnlineLegalIndia for Trademarks services

Controller General of Patents Designs & Trade Marks (CGPDTM) cautions on misleading and Illegal advertising, offering assurance for Trademarks protection through online registration services by OnlineLegalIndiadotcom

Office of The Controller General Patents, Designs & Trade Marks has taken a serious note of certain firms engaging in advertising and solicitation of legal services through various digital and online platforms.

According to a Public Notice issued in this regard, it has been stated that such activities are in direct contravention of the provisions of the Advocates Act, 1961 and relevant rules, which strictly prohibit advocates and legal agents from soliciting or advertising legal services.

Particularly, a website OnlineLegalIndiadotcom has been identified as advertising itself and reaching out to the stakeholders to help them register their trade mark (brand name, logo, slogan, icon, etc.) from anywhere in India through their online registration services. They have been frequently promoting over the platforms like Facebook, Instagram, WhatApp etc.

The Public Notice clarifies that as per provisions of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and the Trade Marks Rules, 2017, the “Registered Trade Mark Agents” and/ or an “Advocate” within the meaning of the Advocates Act, 1961 are only authorized to practice before the Registrar of Trade Marks and as such OnlineLegalIndia.com falling under none of the two categories are not authorized to practice before the Registrar of Trade Marks.

Public has been cautioned and informed that the said website related activities are under inquiry by the Ad-Hoc Code of Conduct Committee (constituted under the direction of Hon’ble Delhi High Court) and have been invited to make their submission to CGPDTM Office.

Download CGPDTM Public Notice Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

ITAT allows exemption of Rs. 25 lakhs u/s 10(10A) to non-government employees

ITAT allowed increased exemption of Rs. 25 lakhs u/s 10(10A) to non-government employees in view of CBDT retrospective notification. In…

18 hours ago
  • Income Tax

PCIT has revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 over the cases passed by the NFAC or the JAO

PCIT has revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 over the cases irrespective of the fact that the relevant assessment was completed physical…

1 day ago
  • Insurance

Appellate court interfering with MACT finding must undertake reappreciation of evidence

Appellate court interfering with Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal findings on assessment of disability and loss of earning capacity must undertake…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

When delay is not huge & involves huge monetary liability, lenient approach to be taken

When period of delay is not very huge and involve huge monetary liability on the assessee, a lenient approach should…

2 days ago
  • SEBI

EoGM of company can not ratify diversion of fund raised by preferential issue – SC

Ratification by EoGM of the company can not give legality of the diversion of the fund raised by preferential issue.…

3 days ago
  • Excise/Custom

Return of export cargo from Hormuz Strait where vessel do not lands at original port

CBIC prescribes procedures for return of export cargo from international waters due to closure of the Strait of Hormuz where…

3 days ago