Uncategorized

CBDT specifies subordination of Chief Commissioners & Principal Commissioners of Income-tax

CBDT specifies subordination of Chief Commissioners & Principal Commissioners of Income-tax

CBDT has directed the order of subordination Chief Commissioners of Income-tax, Principal Commissioners of Income-tax and Income-tax Authorities of Assessment Units with respect to all Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax (Headquarters) i.e. :

1. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat (Ahmedabad)

2. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, Karnataka and Goa (Bengaluru)

3. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, Tamil Nadu (Chennai)

4. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, Delhi (Delhi)

5. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, Andhra Pradesh and Telangana (Hyderabad)

6. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, West Bengal & Sikkim.(Kolkata)

7. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, Mumbai(Mumbai)

8. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, Pune (Pune)

9. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh (Bhopal)

10. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, NWR (Chandigarh)

11. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, Rajasthan (Jaipur)

12. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, UP (West) and Uttarakhand (Kanpur)

13. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, UP (East) (Lucknow)

14. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, Bihar and Jharkhand (Patna)

15. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax (National Faceless Assessment Centre), Delhi

Download CBDT Notification No.60 of 2022 Click Here >>

 

Share

Recent Posts

  • FCRA

FCRA specifies list of 105 purposes to be selected for which registration is applied

FCRA specifies list of purposes to be selected for which registration is applied.  The Ministry of Home Affairs has notified…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Withholding tax u/s 40(a)(i) not required on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company

Assessee was not liable to withhold tax at source u/s 40(a)(i) on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company In a…

2 days ago
  • Government

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App not disproportionate – Delhi High Court

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash not owner who came up to own it

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…

7 days ago
  • RTI

Lokayukta Police not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005 – SC

Lokayukta Police not an ‘intelligence and security’ organisation  and hence not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005…

1 week ago