Uncategorized

CBDT specifies subordination of Chief Commissioners & Principal Commissioners of Income-tax

CBDT specifies subordination of Chief Commissioners & Principal Commissioners of Income-tax

CBDT has directed the order of subordination Chief Commissioners of Income-tax, Principal Commissioners of Income-tax and Income-tax Authorities of Assessment Units with respect to all Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax (Headquarters) i.e. :

1. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat (Ahmedabad)

2. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, Karnataka and Goa (Bengaluru)

3. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, Tamil Nadu (Chennai)

4. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, Delhi (Delhi)

5. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, Andhra Pradesh and Telangana (Hyderabad)

6. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, West Bengal & Sikkim.(Kolkata)

7. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, Mumbai(Mumbai)

8. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, Pune (Pune)

9. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh (Bhopal)

10. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, NWR (Chandigarh)

11. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, Rajasthan (Jaipur)

12. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, UP (West) and Uttarakhand (Kanpur)

13. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, UP (East) (Lucknow)

14. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, Bihar and Jharkhand (Patna)

15. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax (National Faceless Assessment Centre), Delhi

Download CBDT Notification No.60 of 2022 Click Here >>

 

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

12 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

3 days ago
  • GST

A bland statement of ‘fraud or concealment of facts” in GST Notice u/s 74 not sufficient – SC

In GST Notice u/s 74, allegations should emanate from itself, a bland statement of ‘fraud or concealment of facts” not…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

For claiming deduction u/s 57(iii), test is of purpose and connection, not actual yield – ITAT

For claiming deduction u/s 57(iii) a reasonable and intelligible nexus should be established between the expenditure incurred and the income…

6 days ago