bankruptcy

Refund of excess fee paid for delay in filings under regulation 40B of IBBI CRIP Regulations 2016

Refund of excess fee paid for delay in filings under regulation 40B of IBBI CRIP Regulations 2016

According to sub-regulation (4) of regulation 40B of the IBBI (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016 (CIRP Regulations), a fee has to be paid for delay after 1st October, 2020.

The regulation states,

“The filing of a Form under this regulation after due date of submission, whether by correction, updation or otherwise, shall be accompanied by a fee of five hundred rupees per Form for each calendar month of delay after 1st October, 2020.”

The IBBI (Board) has clarified that fee is payable for the period that lapses between the due date of filing a Form or 1st October, 2020, whichever is later, and the actual date of filing the said Form.

In view of the emails received from IPs seeking clarification, the Board has decided to refund the excess amount of fee paid in under mentioned three situations where:

(i) fee has been paid for delay in submission of Form, which was on account of technical glitches;

(ii) fee has been paid twice for filing the same Form; and

(iii) fee has been paid for the delay from the due date.

Read Clarification Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

ITAT allows benefit of the cash bought at the time of migration from Pakistan

Benefit of the cash bought at the time of migration from Pakistan allowed as assessee fulfilled conditions of CBDT Circular…

2 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Ambiguous penalty notices cannot be foundation of imposition of any penalty – SC

Ambiguous notices without striking off the irrelevant limb cannot be the foundation of imposition of any penalty – Supreme Court…

4 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Assessment itself is not a process to penalise assessee for earning undisclosed income – High Court

Assessment itself is not a process to penalise assessee for earning undisclosed income – High Court upheld application of peak…

18 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Actual use of asset is not the sole test for allowability of depreciation – ITAT

Actual use of asset not the sole test for allowability of depreciation and it may be allowed when business only…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Object of assessment proceedings is not to find empirically correct solution on every fact issue – HC

It can never be the object of assessment proceedings to find an empirically, absolutely correct solution on every fact issue…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Penalty u/s 270A deleted as assessee filed revised computation during scrutiny

Penalty u/s 270A deleted as assesse filed revised computation during scrutiny correcting the mistake which was noticed only after the…

1 week ago