Companies Act

Government has no info regarding incomplete, wrong non-updated financial reports by companies with ROC

Government has no info regarding incomplete, wrong non-updated financial reports filed by companies with ROC

Ministry of Corporate Affairs

Press Release

08-03-2016

Submission of Financial Reports

There is no information with the Government regarding companies registered in the offices of registrar of companies are incomplete, wrong and not updated.

However, several companies have not submitted their annual report/return, audited report, balance sheet and details of profit/loss. As per data generated from MCA 21 System, following are the details of companies who have not filed their Balance Sheets and Annual Returns:-

• Not filed only Annual Return for 2015 – 389503

• Not filed only Balance Sheet for 2015 – 386103

• Not filed Annual Return and Balance Sheet for 2015 – 374727

As per the provisions of the section 403 of the Companies Act, 2013 any document can be filed on payment of such additional fees for delay as prescribed within a period of 270 days from the date by which it should have been filed.

The Government had extended the last date upto 30.12.2015 for filing of Annual Returns. Further, for the State of Tamil Nadu and UT of Puducherry, the last date for filing Annual Returns was extended upto 30.01.2016.

This was stated by Shri Arun Jaitley, Minister of Corporate Affairs in written reply to a question in the Lok Sabha today.

*****

DSM/KA
(Release ID :137502)

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without reference to DVO – ITAT

AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without making a reference to the DVO - ITAT In a recent…

4 days ago
  • FCRA

FCRA specifies list of 105 purposes to be selected for which registration is applied

FCRA specifies list of purposes to be selected for which registration is applied.  The Ministry of Home Affairs has notified…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Withholding tax u/s 40(a)(i) not required on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company

Assessee was not liable to withhold tax at source u/s 40(a)(i) on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company In a…

1 week ago
  • Government

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App not disproportionate – Delhi High Court

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash not owner who came up to own it

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…

2 weeks ago