DGFT

Online IEC applications-Code to be issued in firm name – DGFT Clarification

Online IEC applications-Code to be issued in firm name. Supporting documents for address Proof of the firm and requirement of pre-printed cancelled cheque – Clarification

DGFT, in August 2018 notified the new procedure for online IEC applications and mandated that  online application  for  IEC  would  require only 2 documents to be uploaded  i.e.

(a) Address proof the applicant entity; and

(b) Cancelled Cheque bearing entity ‘s pre-printed name or Bank Certificate.

However, there was a confusion about as to in whose name IEC is going to be issued and also about the address and proof thereof.

In view of the above the DGFT has issued a Trade Notice clarifying the following:

(i) IEC is to be issued in the name of the firm . So application has to be made in the name of a The firm may be a proprietorship / partnership/ LLP firm/ HUF firm / an individual or a company (including Government Undertaking/ Public or Private Limited company/ Section 25 company/One Director Company/ Registered Society/ Trust).

(ii) Since there is a need to keep record as to who  is submitting application on behalf of the firm, the person/individual who is submitting the application on behalf of the firm is the applicant. For example , firm name is “Goyal and sons” , the IEC should be in the name of “Goyal & sons”. If one Shri A B Goyal is submitting the application for IEC, the applicant is A B Goyal and his details such as mobile no/email id will be required as applicant.

It is to be noted  that   the mobile no and  email id  of the applicant will be used for verification  and subsequent  log  in. Both  cannot  be changed simultaneously  at any  point  of time.

(iii)  The address of the firm and documents in support of that address are required .

(a) If the document in support of the address of the firm having firm ‘s name (for example X) is available, the same needs to be uploaded.

(b) In case the document in support of the address of the firm is in the name of some other name (for example Y), an NOC from Y in favour of X is also required in addition to document in support of address in the name of Y. Both the documents will establish the address in favour of the firm (X)

(iv) Either of the following documents is acceptable as proof of address (the document should be in the  name of the firm):

  1. Aadhaar Card or (in case of proprietorship )
  2. Voters ID or (in case of proprietorship )
  3. Passport or (in case of proprietorship )
  4. . Electricity/ Telephone (Landline or Mobile) Bill or
  5. GST Registration Certificate or
  6. Bank Certificate as in ANF 2(A) (I)  or
  7. Sale/ lease/ rent deed (relevant pages indicating the seller , buyer and address details)

(v) The proprietorship company  can submit address proof  in favour  of individual  (proprietor) and it need not necessarily be in the name of the firm.

(vi) Clarification on Bank certificate/ pre-printed cancelled cheque:

(a) Either a pre-printed cheque or a bank certificate has to be uploaded.

(b) Pre-printed cheque should have the name of the account holder pre-printed by the bank. A cheque without pre-printed name of the account holder is not acceptable.

(c) Pre-printed cheque should  be in the name of the firm. However , in case of proprietorship firms, pre-printed cheque may be in the name of the individual (proprietor)

(d) Pre-printed cheque can be of a savings account or a current account.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

AO took a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat was 25 lakh – ITAT

Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…

8 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Shareholders can’t be taxed for income from properties owned by the company – HC

Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…

10 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Jurisdictional error in reassessment approval can’t be shielded by the law of limitation

When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…

13 hours ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT ought to remanded whole matter of bogus purchases instead of profit determination

ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…

14 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Where proceedings u/s 153C barred by limitation, AO can’t invoke section 148 & 148A

Where proceedings u/s 153C are barred by limitation, AO can not reopen the case invoking section 148 and 148A of…

1 day ago
  • bankruptcy

Corporate guarantees executed by corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC

Corporate guarantees executed by the corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC and banks to be recognized as financial creditors…

1 day ago