EPFO

Compulsory UAN on claim forms Relaxation by EPFO if the date of leaving/exit of the member is before 01-01-2014 or in exceptional cases

Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation
(Ministry of Labour & Employment, Govt. Of India)
Head Quarters
Bhavishya Nidhi Bhawan, 14- Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi — 110066

No.Coord./40(24)2010/DPG Review Meeting/10215                                                                     Dated: 13.07.2016

To,
All Addl. CPFCs (Zones),
All Regional P.F.Commissioners – I & II
In-charge of Regional/Sub Regional Offices.

Subject:- Use of UAN- making it compulsory – Relaxation in the instructions for UAN on claim forms —regarding.

Reference: Circular No. Coord./40(24)2010/DPG/Review meeting dated 17-12-2015.
(Sl.No.551 in circulars of 2015-16 in EPFO website )

Sir/Madam,

Reference is invited to the circular cited above wherein instructions were issued in para -2 of the cited reference that with effect from 1st January, 2016. no claim form was to be accepted unless Universal Account Number (UAN) was mentioned on the claim form.

2. Instances of difficulties being faced by members on account of the instructions have been brought to notice particularly in respect of members who had ceased to be in employment before 01.2014 given the fact that initially UAN was allotted only to members who were subscribers during January, 2014 to June, 2014. There could also be other cases and instances where insisting on the requirement of UAN with the claim form may cause undue hardship to the claimant.

3. The matter has been, accordingly, reconsidered and it has been decided to relax the instructions in partial modification of directions given in the referred circular as given below:-

i. Claim forms may be accepted without UAN if the date of leaving/exit of the member is before 01.01.2014.

ii. In exceptional cases, the officer-in-charge of the Regional/ Sub- Regional Offices may at their discretion based on the merits of the case allow acceptance of claim forms without UAN.

(This issues with the approval of Central Provident Fund Commissioner.)

Yours faithfully,

(M. Narayanappa)
Additional Central Provident Fund Commissioner-I(Compliance)

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non issue of notice u/s 143(2) for even belated ITR filed u/s 148 makes assessment void ab initio

Non issuance of notice u/s 143(2) for return filed u/s 148 even though belatedly, makes the assessment framed bad in…

3 days ago
  • Insurance

Calculation of functional disability depends on victim’s earning capacity in open market – SC

Calculation of functional disability depends on assessing the victim’s earning capacity in the open, competitive market – Supreme Court In…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Appeal against ITAT shall lie only before High Court within whose jurisdiction AO is situated

Appeal against every decision of ITAT shall lie only before the High Court within whose jurisdiction the Assessing Officer who…

5 days ago
  • Excise/Custom

SC recommends action against Customs Officer who relied upon AI generated fake case laws

Supreme Court recommends action against Commissioner of Customs who relied upon non-existent AI generated case laws. Supreme Court recommends action…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Non- payment of cost imposed can’t trigger automatic confirmation of an invalid exparte assessment.

ITAT power to pass such orders "as it thinks fit" implies a judicial discretion to be exercised within the parameters…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

1 week ago