EPFO

Compulsory UAN on claim forms Relaxation by EPFO if the date of leaving/exit of the member is before 01-01-2014 or in exceptional cases

Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation
(Ministry of Labour & Employment, Govt. Of India)
Head Quarters
Bhavishya Nidhi Bhawan, 14- Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi — 110066

No.Coord./40(24)2010/DPG Review Meeting/10215                                                                     Dated: 13.07.2016

To,
All Addl. CPFCs (Zones),
All Regional P.F.Commissioners – I & II
In-charge of Regional/Sub Regional Offices.

Subject:- Use of UAN- making it compulsory – Relaxation in the instructions for UAN on claim forms —regarding.

Reference: Circular No. Coord./40(24)2010/DPG/Review meeting dated 17-12-2015.
(Sl.No.551 in circulars of 2015-16 in EPFO website )

Sir/Madam,

Reference is invited to the circular cited above wherein instructions were issued in para -2 of the cited reference that with effect from 1st January, 2016. no claim form was to be accepted unless Universal Account Number (UAN) was mentioned on the claim form.

2. Instances of difficulties being faced by members on account of the instructions have been brought to notice particularly in respect of members who had ceased to be in employment before 01.2014 given the fact that initially UAN was allotted only to members who were subscribers during January, 2014 to June, 2014. There could also be other cases and instances where insisting on the requirement of UAN with the claim form may cause undue hardship to the claimant.

3. The matter has been, accordingly, reconsidered and it has been decided to relax the instructions in partial modification of directions given in the referred circular as given below:-

i. Claim forms may be accepted without UAN if the date of leaving/exit of the member is before 01.01.2014.

ii. In exceptional cases, the officer-in-charge of the Regional/ Sub- Regional Offices may at their discretion based on the merits of the case allow acceptance of claim forms without UAN.

(This issues with the approval of Central Provident Fund Commissioner.)

Yours faithfully,

(M. Narayanappa)
Additional Central Provident Fund Commissioner-I(Compliance)

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

How a loan amount was utilised wouldn’t constitute failure to discharge onus u/s 68

Utilisation of loan amount would not constitute failure to discharge onus caste u/s 68 in absence of any defect in…

6 hours ago
  • Income Tax

No addition based on third party information in form of unsigned excel sheet – ITAT

Addition on the basis of third party information in form of unsigned excel sheet can not be sustained - ITAT…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Shagun money received on occasion of marriage not taxable income – ITAT

Shagun money received on marriage of individual cannot be considered as income in the year of its receipt - ITAT…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

There is no statutory requirement to maintain cash book for salaried individual – ITAT

ITAT deleted addition towards cash deposited in bank account observing that there is no statutory requirement to maintain cash book…

5 days ago
  • RBI

Foreign Exchange Management (Authorised Persons) Regulations, 2026 notified

RBI has notified the Foreign Exchange Management (Authorised Persons) Regulations, 2026. The Regulation becomes effective from 06.05.2026  A person seeking…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Increased exemption limit of Rs. 25 lakhs for Leave Encashment is retrospective – ITAT

ITAT allows benefit of increased exemption limit of Rs. 25 lakhs for Leave Encashment u/s 10(10AA)(ii) In a recent judgment,…

6 days ago