EPFO

Compulsory UAN on claim forms Relaxation by EPFO if the date of leaving/exit of the member is before 01-01-2014 or in exceptional cases

Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation
(Ministry of Labour & Employment, Govt. Of India)
Head Quarters
Bhavishya Nidhi Bhawan, 14- Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi — 110066

No.Coord./40(24)2010/DPG Review Meeting/10215                                                                     Dated: 13.07.2016

To,
All Addl. CPFCs (Zones),
All Regional P.F.Commissioners – I & II
In-charge of Regional/Sub Regional Offices.

Subject:- Use of UAN- making it compulsory – Relaxation in the instructions for UAN on claim forms —regarding.

Reference: Circular No. Coord./40(24)2010/DPG/Review meeting dated 17-12-2015.
(Sl.No.551 in circulars of 2015-16 in EPFO website )

Sir/Madam,

Reference is invited to the circular cited above wherein instructions were issued in para -2 of the cited reference that with effect from 1st January, 2016. no claim form was to be accepted unless Universal Account Number (UAN) was mentioned on the claim form.

2. Instances of difficulties being faced by members on account of the instructions have been brought to notice particularly in respect of members who had ceased to be in employment before 01.2014 given the fact that initially UAN was allotted only to members who were subscribers during January, 2014 to June, 2014. There could also be other cases and instances where insisting on the requirement of UAN with the claim form may cause undue hardship to the claimant.

3. The matter has been, accordingly, reconsidered and it has been decided to relax the instructions in partial modification of directions given in the referred circular as given below:-

i. Claim forms may be accepted without UAN if the date of leaving/exit of the member is before 01.01.2014.

ii. In exceptional cases, the officer-in-charge of the Regional/ Sub- Regional Offices may at their discretion based on the merits of the case allow acceptance of claim forms without UAN.

(This issues with the approval of Central Provident Fund Commissioner.)

Yours faithfully,

(M. Narayanappa)
Additional Central Provident Fund Commissioner-I(Compliance)

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income assessee is invalid

Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income by the assessee was invalid. Before filing ITR provisions…

4 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Order u/s 148A(d) passed against non-existent entity is bad in eyes of law – High Court

Order u/s 148A(d) passed against non-existent entity is bad in eyes of law. Mere activation of PAN not give right…

8 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Tax authorities not bound with provisions of section 44AE once assessee waived option

Tax authorities not bound with provisions of section 44AE of the Act once assessee waived the option available In a…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Whether seized document is incriminating or not is a findings of fact – High Court

Whether seized document is incriminating or not is definitely a findings of fact – High Court In a recent judgment,…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Interest earned on borrowed funds/unutilized capital subsidy is capital receipts – High Court

Interest earned on borrowed funds/ unutilized capital subsidy are capital receipts In a recent judgment, Hon'ble Guwahati High Court has…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

No statutory requirement of pre-deposit for stay of demand under Income Tax Act – HC

There is no statutory requirement of pre-deposit for stay of demand under Income Tax Act - High Court stayed demand  …

2 days ago