Excise/Custom

Govt. clarifies issues relating to imposition of Excise Duty on articles of Jewellery with simplified procedures.

Government clarifies to the Jewellery Industry about the issues relating to imposition of Excise Duty on articles of Jewellery with simplified procedures.

Ministry of Finance

Press Release dated 18/03/2016

In the General Budget for 2016-17, a nominal excise duty of 1% [without input tax credit] and 12.5% [with input tax credit] has been imposed on articles of jewellery with simplified procedures.  Salient features of the simplified procedures for this levy have been explained vide press release issued by the Government on 4th of March, 2016.

In this connection, on 17th of March, 2016, a number of representatives of jewellery industry met Secretary (Revenue), Government of India and Chairman (Central Board of Excise &Customs) to discuss the concerns regarding imposition of this levy.

During the meeting, the aforesaid representatives inter-alia raised the following issues:

a) Re-imposition of levy will bring back regime of erstwhile Gold control Act leading to harassment of Jewellers, especially artisans and small goldsmiths.

b) This will also result in visits of Inspectors to the Jewellers thereby bringing back the days of Inspector Raj.

c) Who has to take excise registration and file return?

d) What documents are to be maintained for excise purposes?

The representatives of industry also requested for increase in exemption limit of Rs. 6 crore in a year to Rs.10 crore, and urged for an early consideration of the same.

Regarding concerns relating to procedures and compliance to the levy, the representatives of industry were informed that all these issues have already been clarified vide Chairman’s D.O. letter dated 3rd March, 2016 to field formations and the Press release dated 4th March, 2016, copies of which were also provided to them.

 Further, in the meeting, the following was clarified:

a) In case of jewellery manufactured on job work basis, the liability to take registration, pay duty and to file return is on the principal manufacturer and not on the job worker.

b) Further, exemption from excise duty up to the clearance limit of Rs. 6 crore is available to a jewellery manufacturer if his aggregate value of domestic clearances is less than Rs. 12 crore in the preceding financial year.

c) Artisans and job-workersare not covered within the ambit of this duty and thus they are not required to take registration, pay duty, file returns and maintain any books of account.

d) A jewellery manufacturer having turnover less than Rs. 12 crore during the preceding financial year and less than Rs. 6 crore in the current financial year is not required to take registration and file return.

e) Application for excise registration as well as returns can be filled online [https://www.aces.gov.in/].

f) Directions have been issued to the field formations to provide hassle free registration within two working days. There will be no post registration physical verification of the jeweller’s premises.

g) There is no requirement of declaring pre-budget stocks. Directions have also been issued barring any visits to the jeweller’s premises.

h) Jeweller’s private records or his records for State VAT or for Bureau of Indian Standards (in the case of hallmarked jewellery) would be accepted for all Central Excise purposes.

Useful links:

1)      http://www.cbec.gov.in/htdocs-cbec/ub1617/do-ltr-jstru1-revised.pdf

http://pib.nic.in/newsite/mbErel.aspx?relid=137342

                                *************

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

AO took a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat was 25 lakh – ITAT

Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…

6 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Shareholders can’t be taxed for income from properties owned by the company – HC

Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…

8 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Jurisdictional error in reassessment approval can’t be shielded by the law of limitation

When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…

10 hours ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT ought to remanded whole matter of bogus purchases instead of profit determination

ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…

11 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Where proceedings u/s 153C barred by limitation, AO can’t invoke section 148 & 148A

Where proceedings u/s 153C are barred by limitation, AO can not reopen the case invoking section 148 and 148A of…

1 day ago
  • bankruptcy

Corporate guarantees executed by corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC

Corporate guarantees executed by the corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC and banks to be recognized as financial creditors…

1 day ago