Implicating Customs Brokers as co-noticee in cases involving interpretative disputes

Implicating Customs Brokers as co-noticee in a routine manner, in matters involving interpretation of statute, must be avoided – CBIC

Customs Brokers’ Associations had given representations to CBIC in respect of implicating Customs Brokers as co-noticee in the show cause notices issued to importers/exporters in matters involving interpretative disputes.

The CBIC examined the issue and it was observed that Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018 (CBLR, 2018) regulates provisions for action to be initiated against Custom Brokers for lapses on their part. Therefore, proceedings contemplated against a Customs Broker should be done as per the provisions contained in the CBLR, 2018 and must be distinguished from the proceedings for demand of duty/interest/imposing penalty under Customs Act, 1962. The competent authority must ensure the strict compliance of detailed procedure and timelines as prescribed under Regulation 16 and 17 of CBLR, 2018 while contemplating any action against a Customs Broker under CBLR, 2018.

Further, the CBIC also noted that Pr. Bench of CESTAT, New Delhi in its Study Report on the Final Orders has also highlighted that the offence report sent by the organization booking such offence case should clearly contain the role played by the Custom Broker in the offence case. The Custom Broker being a Co-noticee in the offence case under Customs Act 1962 has to be linked to the proceedings initiated against the Custom Broker under CBLR, 2018. In these Offence cases, it is necessary to prove the element of ‘abetment’ of Custom Broker in the offence.

Accordingly, the CBIC has issued Instruction No. 20/2024-Customs dated 3rd September 2024 stating that implicating Customs Brokers as co-noticee in a routine manner, in matters involving interpretation of statute, must be avoided unless the element of abetment of the Customs Brokers in the investigation is established by the investigating authority. Further, the element of abetment should be clearly elaborated in the Show Cause Notice issued for the offence case under the provisions of the Customs Act, 1962. Further, it has been stated that the suspension of licenses of Customs Brokers, Instruction No. 24/2023 dated 18/07/2023 shall continue to be followed.

• High Court denied pre-arrest bail to accused of fake ITC utilisation
• ITR was not non est for no e-verification when AO took cognizance of returned income
• Section 43CB & ICDS-III is applicable to contractors not to real estate developers
• Expenses of ESOP are allowable as revenue expenditure u/s 37(1) of Income Tax Act.
• Compliance history of supplier can’t be used to invalidate genuine business transactions of buyer