society

Chartered Accountant can’t be made an Inquiry Officer u/s 24 of Societies Registration Act 1860

Chartered Accountant can’t be made an Inquiry Officer under section 24 of Societies Registration Act 1860 – High Court

In a recent judgment, Hon’ble High Court has held that appointment of Chartered Accountant Company can only be made for purpose of conducting audit and it cannot made an Inquiry Officer under section 24 of Societies Registration Act 1860.

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
5068 (2026) (03) abcaus.in HC

In the instant case, the Petitioner had filed a complaint before the Additional Registrar raising dispute regarding election of office-bearers of the society. The Additional Registrar on the complaint of the Petitioner passed an order under provisions of Section 24 of Societies Registration Act, 1860 (the Act) appointing a Chartered Accountant Company as an inquiry officer to investigate the complaint made by the Petitioner.

Before the Hon’ble High Court, the Petitioner objected only to the appointment of a Chartered Accountant Firm as an Inquiry Officer. It was submitted that a CA can not be appointed as Inquiry Officer in terms of relevant provisions of Section 24 of the Act.

It was submitted that some independent person or a government official be appointed as Inquiry Officer. However, the Petitioner submitted that he was not against if appointed Chartered Accountant conducts an audit and submits an audit report to concerned respondents and on basis of it, an inquiry can be further conducted by independent Inquiry Officer in accordance with law.

The respondent fairly admitted that there was an ambiguity in operative part of impugned order and appointment of Chartered Accountant Company can only be made for purpose of conducting audit and it cannot made an Inquiry Officer under relevant provisions.

The Hon’ble High Court observed that a Chartered Accountant Company can not be appointed as Inquiry Officer in any circumstance, therefore, operative part of impugned order was modified to provide that the appointed CA will only conduct audit and will submit its report to concerned respondents and for purpose of appointment of an inquiry officer. 

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

FAQs on Foreign Assets of Small Taxpayers Disclosure Scheme and Rule 2026

Frequently asked Questions on Foreign Assets of Small Taxpayers Disclosure Scheme and Rule 2026.  CBDT has released a FAQs on…

4 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Foreign Assets of Small Taxpayers- Disclosure Scheme Rules 2026 notified

Foreign Assets of Small Taxpayers- Disclosure Scheme Rules 2026 notified. Rule come into force on the 16th day of August,…

5 hours ago
  • GST

Order u/s 69 of the CGST Act has to be communicated before arrest of person concerned– SC

Order u/s 69 of the CGST Act authorising arrest of a person has to be communicated to him before arrest–…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Refund can not be denied on the ground that it was claimed in a return filed u/s 148 – ITAT

Refund can not be denied on the ground that it was claimed in a return filed u/s 148 where no…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Distinction between religious & charitable purposes is determined by institution’s primary or dominant object

The distinction between religious and charitable purposes is determined by institution's primary or dominant object and not merely by presence…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Fit case to issue notice u/s 148 – Relevancy of material & application of mind to objections important

For determination of what constitutes a fit case to issue notice u/s 148, rule of relevancy of the material and…

5 days ago