Excise/Custom

Safeguard Duty on Solar cells – The issue is sub judice before Supreme Court – CBIC

Safeguard Duty on Solar cells whether or not assembled inmodules or panels. Issue is sub judice before Supreme Court which stayed order of Orissa High Court

F.No.276/206/2018-CX.8A
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
(Central Board of Indirect taxes & Customs)
Legal Cell
*****

Wing 5 ‘C’ HUDCO-VISHALA Building
Bhikaji Cama Place, R.K. Puram

New Delhi, the 05th March’2019

To,
1. All Principal Chief Commissioners/ Chief Commissioners of Central Tax &
Customs
2. All Principal Director Generals/ Director Generals of Central Tax & Customs
3. webmaster.cbec@icegate.gov.in

Sir/Madam,

Sub: Writ Petitions on Safeguard Duty on “Solar cells whether or not assembled in modules or panels” -reg.

The undersigned has been directed to state that based on the final findings of Director General of Trade Remedies (DGTR) vide notification No. 22/1/2018-DGTR dated 16.07.2018, recommending to impose safeguard duty against the imports of ‘Solar cells whether or not assembled in modules or panels’ falling under heading 8541 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, safeguard duty is imposed by the Department of Revenue in terms of the Section 8B of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 read with Rule 12 of the Customs Tariff (Identification and Assessment of Safeguard Duty) Rules’ 1997 vide notification No. 1/2018-Customs (SG) dated 30.07.2018.

2. In this regard, number of Writ Petitions have been filed before various High Courts of the country against the imposition of such safeguard duty. In one such Writ Petition (C) No. 12817/2018 filed before the Hon’ble Orissa High Court, the Hon’ble Court in I.A. No. 10566/2018 vide Interim Order dated 23.07.2018, instructed Union of India to not to issue any notification under Rule 12 of the Customs Tariff (Identification and Assessment of Safeguard Duty) Rules, 1997 without the leave of the Court. The Board filed SLP (C) 24009-24010/2018 against the Interim Order and the Hon’ble Supreme Court, vide order dated 10.09.2018 has not only stayed the said Interim Order dated 23.07.2018 but also stayed further proceedings in WP (C) No. 12817/2018 pending before Hon’ble Orissa High Court.

3. Accordingly, since number of petitions on similar issue have been filed in various High Courts throughout the country, the undersigned has been directed to request you that Hon’ble High Courts may please be apprised of the fact that the similar issue is sub judice before the Hon’ble Supreme Court, so that any adverse interim/final order by the respective High Courts may be avoided. In case of any adverse order, appropriate action in terms of filing Review Petition/Writ Appeal or forwarding SLP proposal to Board may also be examined, in consultation with the Ld Law officer/Standing Counsel.

4. The contents of this instruction may be brought to the notice of field formations under your jurisdiction.

Yours faithfully,

(Anish Gupta)
OSD (Legal)
011-26162152

Copy to
1. OSD to Chairman, CBIC, New Delhi for information
2. Director General of Trade Remedies, Department of Commerce, New Delhi for information
3. Joint Secretary, TRU-1, Department of Revenue, New Delhi for information.
4. Commissioner, Directorate of Legal Affairs, CBIC, New Delhi for information.

Share

Recent Posts

  • ICSI

Empanelment of General Observers for ICSI Examinations December 2026. Last date 16.11.2026

Empanelment of General Observers for ICSI Examinations December 2026 ICSI has invited interested members to enroll as General Observers for…

9 hours ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT address some important issues relating to deduction u/s 80IA

ITAT answers some important and inter-related issues relating to deduction u/s 80IA In a recent judgment, ITAT has dealt with…

11 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Mere carry forward of loss can not be denied for belated return – ITAT

Carry forward of loss can not be denied for belated return, it is only the set off in subsequent year…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Sales duly recorded in books & VAT returns, can’t be held bogus without cogent adverse material

Where sales are duly recorded in books and VAT returns, to treat it bogus sales, AO must bringing cogent adverse…

2 weeks ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT allows Diwali expenses incurred by assessee as business expenses

Expenses to celebrate Diwali with staff creates a goodwill and, therefore amounts to expenses incurred for the purpose of business…

2 weeks ago
  • Income Tax

Section 292BB does not bar assessee to raise objection for non issuance of notice u/s 143(2) – SC

Section 292BB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 does not preclude Assessee raising objection for non issuance of notice u/s…

2 weeks ago