Excise/Custom

Scope of word site as per Central Excise Notification No.12/2012 particularly for projects as road construction, laying pipelines/railway tracks etc

Circular  No.1036/24/2016-CX

F. No. 68/1/2016- CX.II
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department  of Revenue
Central Baord of Excise and Custom

New Delhi, dated the 6th July, 2016

To,
Principal Chief Commissioner of Central Excise/ Service Tax (All),
Chief Commissioners of Central Excise/ Service Tax (All),
Principal Commissioner of Central Excise/ Service Tax (All).

Madam/Sir ,

Subject:- Scope of  word  ‘site’ appearing in Notification No.12/2012 Central Excise, dated 17.03.2012-reg

Representations have been received  from the trade regarding difficulties being faced in availing of benefit of exemption applicable to goods manufactured at the site of construction for use in construction work at such site vide S. No. 186 of Notification No. 12/2012-Central Excise, dated 17.03.2012, as amended. The issue is, how should the expression  “site” used  and defined in the aforesaid notification  be interpreted , particularly for projects which run long distances, such as construction of road, laying of pipelines or laying of railway tracks etc.

2.1 The  issue  has  been  examined  in  the  Board.  The  expression  site  has  been defined in the notification (ibid) as “any premises made available for the manufacture of  goods  by  way  of  a  specific  mention   in  the  contract  or  agreement for such construction work , provided that the goods manufactured  at such premises are solely used in the said construction work only”.

2.2 It is clear from the definition  that the expression “site” cannot be given a restrictive  meaning  while  interpreting the  same  so  long  as  the  premises  under consideration for availing benefit of exemption under S.No. 186 of Notification No. 12/2012-Central Excise, dated 17.03.2012 fulfils following conditions:-

i The said premises are made available to the manufacturer of goods by way of a specific mention in the contract/agreement for such construction work

ii The goods under Chapter 68 (except 6804,6805,6811, 6812 and 6813), for which exemption is claimed are manufactured at the said premises; and

iii Such goods manufactured at the said premises are exclusively used for the construction work, as per the relevant contract or agreement.

3. It appears that in some field formations, the distance at which goods manufactured at site is used in the project, has been considered as criteria for examining the eligibility of goods for This is an extraneous criteria not flowing from the language used in the notification , particularly when the expression “site” stands explained in the notification . As explained in para 2.2 above, the eligibility criteria must flow from the plain reading of the explanation of the expression “site” in the notification .

4. In view of the above, it is hereby directed that each case may be decided taking into consideration the facts of the individual case, examined in light of the clarification given Circular No. 456/22/99-CX, dated 18.05.1999 is hereby rescinded.

5. Field formations and trade may be suitably informed . Difficulty experienced , if any, in implementing the circular should be brought to the notice of the Board . Hindi version would follow.

(Santosb Kumar Mishra)
Under Secretary to the Government of India

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

AO took a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat was 25 lakh – ITAT

Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…

8 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Shareholders can’t be taxed for income from properties owned by the company – HC

Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…

10 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Jurisdictional error in reassessment approval can’t be shielded by the law of limitation

When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…

13 hours ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT ought to remanded whole matter of bogus purchases instead of profit determination

ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…

14 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Where proceedings u/s 153C barred by limitation, AO can’t invoke section 148 & 148A

Where proceedings u/s 153C are barred by limitation, AO can not reopen the case invoking section 148 and 148A of…

1 day ago
  • bankruptcy

Corporate guarantees executed by corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC

Corporate guarantees executed by the corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC and banks to be recognized as financial creditors…

1 day ago