Excise/Custom

Extension of transitional provisions of Sea Cargo Manifest & Transhipment Regulations 2018

Extension of transitional provisions of Sea Cargo Manifest and Transhipment Regulations 2018

MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
(CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS)

Notification No. 66/2020-Customs (N.T.)

New Delhi, the 31st July, 2020

G.S.R.486(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 157, read with sections 30, 30A, 41, 41A, 53, 54, 56, sub-section (3) of section 98 and sub-section (2) of section 158 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs hereby makes the following regulations further to amend the Sea Cargo Manifest and Transhipment Regulations, 2018, namely: –

1. Short title and commencement.—(1) These regulations may be called the Sea Cargo Manifest and Transhipment (Second Amendment) Regulations, 2020.

(2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.

2.In the Sea Cargo Manifest and Transhipment Regulations, 2018, in regulation 15:

a. in sub-regulation (1), for the expression,“from 15th May, 2020 till 1st August, 2020”, the expression,“from 15th May, 2020 till 30th September, 2020” shall be substituted;

b. in sub-regulation (2), for the words,figures and letters “till 1st August, 2020” the words,figures and letters “till 30th September, 2020” shall be substituted.

[F. No. 450/58/2015-Cus-IV]

ANANTH RATHAKRISHNAN, Dy.Secy.(Customs)

Note: The principal regulations were published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3 Sub-section (i) vide number G.S.R. 448(E), dated the 11th May, 2018 and were last amended vide notification No. 14/2020-Customs (N.T) dated the 14th February, 2020 vide number G.S.R. 121 (E),dated the 14th February, 2020

Download Notification Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Service Tax

Demand set aside as assessee for period covered had discharged tax liability under SVLDRS

High Court sets aside demand notices in respect of a period, for which the assessee had discharged tax liability under…

2 hours ago
  • Income Tax

No addition u/s 68 when there is no fresh receipt of unsecured loans during the year

Addition u/s 68 can not be made applicable where there is no fresh receipt of unsecured loans at all during…

5 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Taxes on sales comprising in turnover to be excluded for estimating net profit

Amount of taxes on sales comprising in turnover to be excluded while computing gross receipts for estimating net profit -…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Capital contribution deposited in assessee’s bank not partnership firm – Addition 69A upheld

Addition u/s 69A confirmed as alleged capital contribution by partners was deposited in bank account of assessee not in account…

1 day ago
  • GST

Bail granted to a CA accused in a GST evasion of more than 40 crores

Allahabad High Court grants bail to Chartered Accountant accused in a GST evasion to the tune of more than 40…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Every provision invoked casts a different onus, quoting wrong section prejudice the assessee

Every provision invoked casts a different sort of onus on the assessee – ITAT deleted addition u/s 69 towards bogus…

2 days ago