Extension of transitional provisions of Sea Cargo Manifest and Transhipment Regulations 2018
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
(CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS)
New Delhi, the 31st July, 2020
G.S.R.486(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 157, read with sections 30, 30A, 41, 41A, 53, 54, 56, sub-section (3) of section 98 and sub-section (2) of section 158 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs hereby makes the following regulations further to amend the Sea Cargo Manifest and Transhipment Regulations, 2018, namely: –
1. Short title and commencement.—(1) These regulations may be called the Sea Cargo Manifest and Transhipment (Second Amendment) Regulations, 2020.
(2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.
2.In the Sea Cargo Manifest and Transhipment Regulations, 2018, in regulation 15:
a. in sub-regulation (1), for the expression,“from 15th May, 2020 till 1st August, 2020”, the expression,“from 15th May, 2020 till 30th September, 2020” shall be substituted;
b. in sub-regulation (2), for the words,figures and letters “till 1st August, 2020” the words,figures and letters “till 30th September, 2020” shall be substituted.
[F. No. 450/58/2015-Cus-IV]
ANANTH RATHAKRISHNAN, Dy.Secy.(Customs)
Note: The principal regulations were published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3 Sub-section (i) vide number G.S.R. 448(E), dated the 11th May, 2018 and were last amended vide notification No. 14/2020-Customs (N.T) dated the 14th February, 2020 vide number G.S.R. 121 (E),dated the 14th February, 2020
Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…
Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…
When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…
ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…
Where proceedings u/s 153C are barred by limitation, AO can not reopen the case invoking section 148 and 148A of…
Corporate guarantees executed by the corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC and banks to be recognized as financial creditors…