Extension of the validity of FCRA registration certificates till 30.06.2022
No. II/21022/23(22)/2020-FCRA-III
Government of India
Ministry of Home Affairs
(Foreigners Division-FCRA)
First Floor, Major Dhyan Chand National Stadium,
India Gate Circle, New Delhi-110001
Dated: the 24th March, 2022
In continuation of Ministry of Home Affairs’ Public Notice No. II/21022/23(22)/2020-FCRA-III, Dated 31st December, 2021, the Central Government, in public interest, has decided to extend the validity of FCRA registration certificates of certain categories of FCRA registered entities, as follows:
(i) The validity of registration certificates of such entities whose validity was extended 31.03.2022 in terms of the Public Notice dated 3151 December, 2021 and whose renewal application is pending will stand extended till 30.06.2022 or till the date of disposal of renewal application, whichever is earlier.
(ii) The validity of those FCRA entities whose 5 years validity period is expiring during 04.2022 to 30.06.2022 and who have applied/apply for renewal before expiry of 5 years validity period will stand extended upto 30.06.2022 or till the date of disposal of renewal application, whichever is earlier.
2. All FCRA registered associations are therefore advised to take note that in case of refusal of the application for renewal of certificate of registration, the validity of the certificate shall be deemed to have expired on the date of refusal of the application of renewal and the association shall not be eligible either to receive the foreign contribution or utilise the foreign contribution received.
3. This issues with the approval of the Competent Authority. of the above decision and take appropriate action in the matter.
(B.C. Joshi)
Director (FCRA) Tele. 011-23070412
Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…
Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…
When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…
ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…
Where proceedings u/s 153C are barred by limitation, AO can not reopen the case invoking section 148 and 148A of…
Corporate guarantees executed by the corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC and banks to be recognized as financial creditors…