GST

AGFTC and ITBA requests FM to reduce penalty u/s 73(9) of the CGST Act 2017

AGFTC and ITBA requests Finance Minister to reduce penalty u/s 73(9) of the CGST Act 2017

All Gujarat Federation of Tax Consultants (AGFTC) and Income Tax Bar Association (ITBA), Ahmedabad has given a Representation to Union Minister of Finance  to amend the penalty provision under section 73(9) of the CGST Act, 2017.

Section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017 provides for determination of tax paid or short paid or erroneously refunded or input tax credit wrongly availed or utilized for any reason other than fraud or any willful misstatement or suppression of facts.

Sub section 9 of section 73 further provides for tax, interest and a penalty equivalent to ten percent of tax or  Rs. 10000/- (ten thousand rupees), whichever is higher.

It has been represented that as the section 73 is for tax paid or short paid or erroneously refunded or input tax credit wrongly availed or utilized for any reason other than fraud or any willful misstatement or suppression of facts, the penalty provision for any genuine mistake is very harsh. It has been stated that in cases where tax amount is more than ten lacs rupees, Penalty of ten percent of tax is also very high. The penalty provision of ten percent of tax for any genuine mistake is very harsh.

The representation has pointed out that under Section 125 a general penalty has already been provided which may extend to twenty-five thousand rupees.

According to the representation made, in case of a genuine mistake , the penalty under section 73(9) should not be more than twenty-five thousand. It has bene illustrated that since the minimum penalty is Rs. 10000/-, even for a genuine mistake of small amount of Rs. 100/- total  penalty is 10000/- which is 100% of the demand.

Further, it has been pointed out that in the case where tax amount is more than ten lacs rupees , Penalty of ten percent of tax is also very high. The penalty provision of ten percent of tax for any genuine mistake is very harsh.

Relying on the provisions of Section 125 which provides for General penalty up to Rs. Twenty-five thousand rupees, it has been requested that for a genuine mistake of any registered dealer, the penalty under section 73(9) should not be more than twenty-five thousand.

Request made:

The Ministry has been requested to amend the minimum  penalty amount u/s 73(9) as under

(i) to provide for penalty equivalent to ten percent of tax or one thousand rupees, whichever is higher.

(ii) Alternatively, to provide for a penalty equivalent to ten percent of tax or twenty-five thousand rupees, whichever is lesser. 

Read Representation Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Denying accumulation of u/s 11(2) merely on grounds of delay in filing Form No. 10 is unsustainable

Denying the accumulation of u/s 11(2) merely on grounds of a procedural delay in filing Form No. 10 is unsustainable…

11 hours ago
  • Empanelment

Engagement of 05 Young Professionals CAs at Central Registrar of Cooperative Society

Engagement of 05 Young Professionals CAs in the Office of Central Registrar of Cooperative Society on contractual basis The office…

15 hours ago
  • Income Tax

AO can’t take two different stands on immunity u/s 270AA(2) for a same transaction

Immunity u/s 270AA(2) in respect of a single transaction can not be denied to one assessee when the penalty was…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT held 2000 gram jewellery reasonable in view of customary practices & CBDT Instruction

ITAT deleted addition u/s 69A towards jewellery found in search in view of Indian traditions, CBDT Instruction and High Court…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Documents obtained post search & information obtained from public domain not incriminating material

Documents obtained post search and information obtained from the public domain not incriminating material. Documents obtained by AO post search…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

No second reopening for unexplained credits in bank due to bank’s name change

Information of deposits in bank did not constitute fresh information necessitating second reopening due to change in bank name In…

4 days ago