GST

AGFTC and ITBA requests FM to reduce penalty u/s 73(9) of the CGST Act 2017

AGFTC and ITBA requests Finance Minister to reduce penalty u/s 73(9) of the CGST Act 2017

All Gujarat Federation of Tax Consultants (AGFTC) and Income Tax Bar Association (ITBA), Ahmedabad has given a Representation to Union Minister of Finance  to amend the penalty provision under section 73(9) of the CGST Act, 2017.

Section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017 provides for determination of tax paid or short paid or erroneously refunded or input tax credit wrongly availed or utilized for any reason other than fraud or any willful misstatement or suppression of facts.

Sub section 9 of section 73 further provides for tax, interest and a penalty equivalent to ten percent of tax or  Rs. 10000/- (ten thousand rupees), whichever is higher.

It has been represented that as the section 73 is for tax paid or short paid or erroneously refunded or input tax credit wrongly availed or utilized for any reason other than fraud or any willful misstatement or suppression of facts, the penalty provision for any genuine mistake is very harsh. It has been stated that in cases where tax amount is more than ten lacs rupees, Penalty of ten percent of tax is also very high. The penalty provision of ten percent of tax for any genuine mistake is very harsh.

The representation has pointed out that under Section 125 a general penalty has already been provided which may extend to twenty-five thousand rupees.

According to the representation made, in case of a genuine mistake , the penalty under section 73(9) should not be more than twenty-five thousand. It has bene illustrated that since the minimum penalty is Rs. 10000/-, even for a genuine mistake of small amount of Rs. 100/- total  penalty is 10000/- which is 100% of the demand.

Further, it has been pointed out that in the case where tax amount is more than ten lacs rupees , Penalty of ten percent of tax is also very high. The penalty provision of ten percent of tax for any genuine mistake is very harsh.

Relying on the provisions of Section 125 which provides for General penalty up to Rs. Twenty-five thousand rupees, it has been requested that for a genuine mistake of any registered dealer, the penalty under section 73(9) should not be more than twenty-five thousand.

Request made:

The Ministry has been requested to amend the minimum  penalty amount u/s 73(9) as under

(i) to provide for penalty equivalent to ten percent of tax or one thousand rupees, whichever is higher.

(ii) Alternatively, to provide for a penalty equivalent to ten percent of tax or twenty-five thousand rupees, whichever is lesser. 

Read Representation Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Distinction between religious & charitable purposes is determined by institution’s primary or dominant object

The distinction between religious and charitable purposes is determined by institution's primary or dominant object and not merely by presence…

19 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Fit case to issue notice u/s 148 – Relevancy of material & application of mind to objections important

For determination of what constitutes a fit case to issue notice u/s 148, rule of relevancy of the material and…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

AO is under an obligation to assign reasons for rejecting explanation of the assessee

AO is under an obligation to duly consider the explanation furnished by the assessee and assign reasons for rejecting the…

2 days ago
  • Excise/Custom

CBIC issues SoP for clearance of imported goods through Foreign Post Offices

CBIC issues SoP for clearance of imported goods through Foreign Post Offices under Postal Import Regulations, 2025.  Standard Operating Procedure…

2 days ago
  • civil-law

Sale deed executed with full knowledge of only part consideration paid, not void – SC

Sale deed executed with full knowledge of only part consideration paid, cannot be rendered void or inoperative merely for non…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

No fault in serving notice to last known address when PAN data was not updated – ITAT

No fault in serving notice u/s 148 to last known address when assessee had not updated change of address in…

2 days ago