GST

AGFTC and ITBA requests FM to reduce penalty u/s 73(9) of the CGST Act 2017

AGFTC and ITBA requests Finance Minister to reduce penalty u/s 73(9) of the CGST Act 2017

All Gujarat Federation of Tax Consultants (AGFTC) and Income Tax Bar Association (ITBA), Ahmedabad has given a Representation to Union Minister of Finance  to amend the penalty provision under section 73(9) of the CGST Act, 2017.

Section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017 provides for determination of tax paid or short paid or erroneously refunded or input tax credit wrongly availed or utilized for any reason other than fraud or any willful misstatement or suppression of facts.

Sub section 9 of section 73 further provides for tax, interest and a penalty equivalent to ten percent of tax or  Rs. 10000/- (ten thousand rupees), whichever is higher.

It has been represented that as the section 73 is for tax paid or short paid or erroneously refunded or input tax credit wrongly availed or utilized for any reason other than fraud or any willful misstatement or suppression of facts, the penalty provision for any genuine mistake is very harsh. It has been stated that in cases where tax amount is more than ten lacs rupees, Penalty of ten percent of tax is also very high. The penalty provision of ten percent of tax for any genuine mistake is very harsh.

The representation has pointed out that under Section 125 a general penalty has already been provided which may extend to twenty-five thousand rupees.

According to the representation made, in case of a genuine mistake , the penalty under section 73(9) should not be more than twenty-five thousand. It has bene illustrated that since the minimum penalty is Rs. 10000/-, even for a genuine mistake of small amount of Rs. 100/- total  penalty is 10000/- which is 100% of the demand.

Further, it has been pointed out that in the case where tax amount is more than ten lacs rupees , Penalty of ten percent of tax is also very high. The penalty provision of ten percent of tax for any genuine mistake is very harsh.

Relying on the provisions of Section 125 which provides for General penalty up to Rs. Twenty-five thousand rupees, it has been requested that for a genuine mistake of any registered dealer, the penalty under section 73(9) should not be more than twenty-five thousand.

Request made:

The Ministry has been requested to amend the minimum  penalty amount u/s 73(9) as under

(i) to provide for penalty equivalent to ten percent of tax or one thousand rupees, whichever is higher.

(ii) Alternatively, to provide for a penalty equivalent to ten percent of tax or twenty-five thousand rupees, whichever is lesser. 

Read Representation Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Order u/s 263 enhancing disallowance quashed as CIT (A) has power of enhancements – ITAT

ITAT quashed order u/s 263 enhancing disallowance observing in appellate proceedings, CIT(A) has power of enhancements of income assessed, if…

45 minutes ago
  • Income Tax

Penalty section cannot be subject matter of revisionary jurisdiction under section 263

Section under which penalty should be initiated cannot be subject matter of revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 of Income Tax…

11 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Related party transaction u/s 40A(2) shall be treated as bona fide, unless evading tax

Related party transaction u/s 40A(2) shall be treated as bona fide, unless AO finds that one of them is trying…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

‘Transfer of property’ not include ‘acquiring’ of property or ‘purchasing’ of property – ITAT

The word ‘transfer of property’ does not include ‘acquiring’ of property or ‘purchasing’ of property and only can be confined…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

AO was not justified in questioning cash withdrawals from bank account – ITAT

AO is not justified in questioning the cash withdrawals from bank account on the ground that the assessee had sufficient…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Return/Balance sheet filed within limitation extended by SC to be considered within time

Return/Balance sheet to be considered as being within time if filed within timeline condoned by Hon'ble Supreme Court due to…

2 days ago